...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews neuroscience >Comparative efficacy of antimicrobials for treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of antimicrobials for treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:抗微生物治疗乳酸乳牛临床乳腺炎的比较疗效:系统综述与网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the relative efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle. Controlled trials in lactating dairy cattle with natural disease exposure were eligible if they compared an antimicrobial treatment to a non-treated control, placebo, or a different antimicrobial, for the treatment of clinical mastitis, and assessed clinical or bacteriologic cure. Potential for bias was assessed using a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. From 14775 initially identified records, 54 trials were assessed as eligible. Networks were established for bacteriologic cure by bacterial species group, and clinical cure. Disparate networks among bacteriologic cures precluded meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis was conducted for trials assessing clinical cure, but lack of precision of point estimates resulted in wide credibility intervals for all treatments, with no definitive conclusions regarding relative efficacy. Consideration of network geometry can inform future research to increase the utility of current and previous work. Replication of intervention arms and consideration of connection to existing networks would improve the future ability to determine relative efficacy. Challenges in the evaluation of bias in primary research stemmed from a lack of reporting. Consideration of reporting guidelines would also improve the utility of future research.
机译:进行了系统审查和网络荟萃分析,以评估抗菌治疗对哺乳酸奶牛临床乳腺炎的相对疗效。如果他们将抗菌治疗与未治疗的对照,安慰剂或不同抗菌剂进行比较,则赋予乳制乳制牛的受控试验,用于治疗临床乳腺炎,并评估临床或细菌治疗的抗微生物治疗。使用偏置2.0工具的改性的Cochrane风险评估偏差潜力。从14775年开始,最初确定的记录,54项试验被评估为符合条件。通过细菌种群和临床治疗,建立了用于细菌治疗的网络。不同的网络之间的细菌学治疗中的网络排除了Meta分析。对评估临床治疗的试验进行网络荟萃分析,但点估计的缺乏精度导致所有治疗的可信度间隔,没有关于相对疗效的明确结论。对网络几何的考虑可以为未来的研究提供信息,以增加当前和以前的工作的效用。干预武器的复制和对现有网络的联系的考虑将提高确定相对效能的未来能力。缺乏报告中缺乏初步研究偏倚评估的挑战。审议报告指南也将改善未来研究的效用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature reviews neuroscience》 |2019年第2期|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Guelph Dept Populat Med 50 Stone Rd East Guelph ON N1G 2W1 Canada;

    Univ Guelph Dept Populat Med 50 Stone Rd East Guelph ON N1G 2W1 Canada;

    Iowa State Univ Coll Vet Med Dept Vet Diagnost &

    Prod Anim Med Ames IA 50011 USA;

    Iowa State Univ Coll Vet Med Dept Vet Diagnost &

    Prod Anim Med Ames IA 50011 USA;

    Univ Guelph Dept Populat Med 50 Stone Rd East Guelph ON N1G 2W1 Canada;

    Ontario Minist Agr Food &

    Rural Affairs 1 Stone Rd West Guelph ON N1G 4Y2 Canada;

    Univ Guelph Ctr Publ Hlth &

    Zoonoses 50 Stone Rd East Guelph ON N1G 2W1 Canada;

    Ontario Minist Agr Food &

    Rural Affairs 1 Stone Rd West Guelph ON N1G 4Y2 Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 神经生理学;
  • 关键词

    Dairy cow; mixed treatment comparison; udder health;

    机译:奶牛;混合治疗比较;乳房健康;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号