...
首页> 外文期刊>Food and bioprocess technology >Cheese Whey and Ricotta Whey for the Growth and Encapsulation of Endogenous Lactic Acid Bacteria
【24h】

Cheese Whey and Ricotta Whey for the Growth and Encapsulation of Endogenous Lactic Acid Bacteria

机译:奶酪乳清和意大利乳清乳清的生长和封装内源性乳酸菌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the ability of endogenous Lactobacillus paracasei ATR6 to grow in unsupplemented bovine cheese whey (CW) and ricotta whey (RW), and to evaluate the efficiency of these media as encapsulating agents for the spray-drying (SD) of this bacterium. Growth assays indicated that both CW and RW are adequate culture media since L. paracasei ATR6 grew satisfactorily (~ 4 log cycles) in both compared to the control medium (skimmed milk). Concerning their potential as encapsulating agents, results showed that survival rates after SD were similar for CW and RW (> 78%), as were the yields (> 47%) of this process. CW allowed the formation of smaller capsules (5.31 +/- 1.27 mu m) than RW (15.21 +/- 7.24 mu m), with lower moisture: 8.60% and 13.52%, respectively. Powders were stored at 25 degrees C for 60 days, during which CW and RW maintained satisfactory bacterial viability. Water activity increased, yet remained below 0.3. Moisture content of CW and RW powders was relatively stable throughout the 60 days; however, values obtained in this study are considered to lie outside the adequate range (4-7%) for product stability. We did not observe color changes in CW and RW microcapsules during storage. Due to its lower protein content, RW offered less protection, which led to higher loss in acidification ability of the strain. CW and RW are suitable culture media and encapsulating agents for the growth of L. paracasei ATR6; however, the former offered better protection, which enabled the maintenance of biological activity.
机译:本研究的目的是比较内源性Lactobarillus帕拉沙萨氏菌ATR6在未膜奶酪乳清(CW)和意大利乳清乳清(RW)中生长的能力,并评估这些培养基的效率作为喷雾干燥的包封剂(SD )这种细菌。生长测定表明,CW和RW均为足够的培养基,因为与对照培养基(脱脂牛奶)相比,帕拉沙萨氏菌ATR6令人满意地增长(〜4个原木)。关于它们作为包封剂的潜力,结果表明,SD后的存活率与CW和RW(> 78%)相似,如该方法的产率(> 47%)。 CW允许形成较小的胶囊(5.31 +/- 1.27 mu m),而不是Rw(15.21 +/- 7.24 mu m),水分较低:8.60%和13.52%。粉末在25℃下储存60天,在此期间CW和RW保持令人满意的细菌活力。水活动增加,但仍保持在0.3以下。在60天内,CW和RW粉末的水分含量相对稳定;然而,本研究中获得的值被认为是在产品稳定性的足够范围(4-7%)之外。在储存期间,我们没有观察CW和RW微胶囊中的颜色变化。由于其较低的蛋白质含量,RW提供了更少的保护,这导致菌株的酸化能力较高。 CW和Rw是合适的培养基和包封剂,用于L. parac酰亚联器的生长6;然而,前者提供了更好的保护,这使得能够维持生物活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号