首页> 外文期刊>Georgetown Journal of International Law >IS THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS REALLY OVER? THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN AFRICA— DOMESTICIZATION, HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED DEVELOPMENT, AND EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE OBLIGATIONS
【24h】

IS THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS REALLY OVER? THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN AFRICA— DOMESTICIZATION, HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED DEVELOPMENT, AND EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE OBLIGATIONS

机译:人权的年龄真的是结束吗? 非洲教育权 - 捍卫人权,基于人权的发展和域外国家义务

获取原文
       

摘要

It has recently been suggested that the age of human rights is over. The West, itself often not respecting human rights, is said to have abused the concept as a tool to retain control over the developing world. Human rights have remained a foreign construct in Africa, the Near East, and Asia. They have "underperformed, " and the level of privation in many parts of the world is more intense than ever. This A rticle ackn owledges elements of tru th in these observations, but argues that the battle for human rights is not lost. Using the right to education in Africa as an example, three arguments will be presented to explain how human rights can regai n their moral cogency and actually help change a world of misery for the better. First, human rights need to be "domestidzed," made "home-grown" achievements -with which local populations can identify. Regional human rights institutions need to give specificity to universal norms. These "locally-owned" norms must then be effectively enforced. Second, pure “development goal” approaches to reducing global poverty need to be debunked. Instead, a human rights approach needs to identify clear duty-bearers, including notably the World Bank, who, when they have failed to comply with specified duties, should be considered "human rights violators" and held accountable accordingly. Third, and perhaps most importantly, human rights must be recognized to give rise to extraterritorial state obligations. These are obligations of states, in appropriate circumstances, to respect, protect, and fulfill the human rights of those beyond their own territory. The extraterritorial human rights obligations of states must structure bilateral development assistance and cooperation, the lending operations of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and free trade within and beyond the World Trade Organization (here, meaning the General Agreement on Trade in Services and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights).
机译:最近有的建议,人权的时代结束了。西方,本身往往不尊重人权,据说已经滥用了这一概念作为一个留给发展中国家的控制的工具。人权仍然是非洲的外国建设,近东和亚洲。他们有“表现不佳”,世界许多地方的贫困水平比以往任何时候都更加激烈。这是一个rtices a在这些观察中为tru the的元素笼罩着,但认为人权之战并没有丢失。以非洲的教育权为例,将提出三个论点,以解释人权如何衡量他们的道德核心,实际上有助于改变痛苦的世界。首先,人权需要“弥漫主义”,使“家庭成长”成就 - 哪些地方群体可以识别。区域人权机构需要对普遍规范提供特殊性。然后必须有效强制执行这些“本地拥有”规范。其次,纯粹的“发展目标”方法,减少全球贫困需要被揭穿。相反,人权方法需要识别清晰的责任,包括尤其是世界银行,当他们未能遵守规定的职责时,应该被视为“人权违规者”并相应持责任。第三,也许最重要的是,必须认识到人权,以产生域外国家义务。这些都是国家在适当情况下尊重,保护和履行其自身领域的人权的义务。各国的域外人权义务必须构建双边发展援助和合作,国际货币基金组织和世界银行的贷款业务,以及世界贸易组织内外的自由贸易(这里,这意味着服务贸易总体贸易协议关于知识产权的贸易相关方面的协议)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号