...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. >Bed rest after an embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Bed rest after an embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:胚胎转移后卧床休息:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Bed rest for the variable duration is commonly recommended after an embryo transfer (ET) carried out during an in vitro fertilization (IVF). This is based on beliefs that supine position and the reduction of physical activity-to the minimum-might prevent the risk of embryo expulsion once is transferred to the uterus. Therefore, we have designed a meta-analysis based exclusively on evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in the attempt to analyze the effectiveness of bed rest after an ET to improve the chance for success in vitro fertilization. Methods The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019122758), and data extraction started before protocol publication. Five RCTs were included; 499 women were assigned to the intervention group and 503 to the control group. Results The analysis of 1002 women did not show any significant change in clinical pregnancy rate between groups [RR 0.86, 95% CI (0.74-1.00), p = 0.06, I-2 = 0%]. Likewise, no difference was found in live birth [RR 0.93, 95% CI (0.51-1.69) p = 0.81, I-2 = 68%], ongoing pregnancy rate [RR 0.84, 95% CI (0.60-1.20), p = 0.34, I-2 = 63%], miscarriage rate [RR 1.08, 95% CI (0.46-2.57), p = 0.86, I-2 = 64%], multiple pregnancy rate [RR 0.08, 95% CI (0.50-1.04), p = 0.71, I-2 = 0%] or implantation rate [RR 0.90, 95% CI (0.72-1.13), p = 0.38, I-2 = 0%]. Subgroup analyses-considering only immediate mobilization or bed rest 24 h-did not show significant differences regarding the outcome. Conclusion Our findings showed that immediate mobilization after an ET does not have a negative influence over the success rates of IVF. Therefore, bed rest should not be recommended.
机译:引入床休息于可变持续时间通常建议在体外施肥期间进行的胚胎转移(ET)之后。这是基于信念,即仰卧位和身体活性的减少 - 最小可能阻止胚胎排出的风险转移到子宫。因此,我们专门设计了从发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的证据,试图分析床休息后的有效性,以改善成功的体外施肥的机会。方法在Prospero(CRD42019122758)中注册了审查协议,并在协议发布之前启动了数据提取。包括五个rcts; 499名妇女被分配到干预组和503号对照组。结果1002名女性的分析未显示临床妊娠率的任何显着变化[RR 0.86,95%CI(0.74-1.00),P = 0.06,I-2 = 0%]。同样,在活产出的情况下没有发现差异[RR 0.93,95%CI(0.51-1.69)p = 0.81,I-2 = 68%],正在进行的妊娠率[RR 0.84,95%CI(0.60-1.20),P = 0.34,I-2 = 63%],流产率[RR 1.08,95%CI(0.46-2.57),P = 0.86,I-2 = 64%],多妊娠率[RR 0.08,95%CI(0.50 -1.04),P = 0.71,I-2 = 0%]或植入速率[RR 0.90,95%CI(0.72-1.13),P = 0.38,I-2 = 0%]。亚组分析 - 仅考虑立即动员或卧床休息24 H-尚未显示出关于结果的显着差异。结论我们的研究结果表明,ET后立即动员在IVF的成功率上没有负面影响。因此,不应推荐卧床休息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号