...
首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology >Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:囊胚转移或卵裂期胚胎转移对单胎婴儿的新生儿结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Comparative neonatal outcomes with respect to singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-state embryo transfers are controversial with respect to which method is superior. Many studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing neonatal outcomes in single births following IVF/ICSI. Methods We searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CCTR) databases until October 2016. Studies and trials that contained neonatal outcomes for singleton births were included. Data were extracted in 2 × 2 tables. The analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.1 software. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences, with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to assess the results of each outcome. Subgroups were applied in all outcomes. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) checklists were used to assess the quality of the referenced studies. Results Twelve studies met the criteria in this meta-analysis. There was a high risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer versus the risk after cleavage-stage transfer (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.22). For the “only fresh” subgroup, the outcome was coincident (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.27). For the “fresh and frozen” and “only frozen” subgroups, there were no differences. Patients who received fresh blastocyst embryo transfers had a high risk of very preterm births (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.31). Finally, cleavage-stage embryo transfers were associated with a high risk of infants who were small for gestational age (0.83, 95% CI: 0.76–0.92) and a low risk of those who were large for gestation age (1.14, 95% CI: 1.04–1.25). Conclusions The risks of preterm and very preterm births increased after fresh blastocyst transfers versus the risks after fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. However, in frozen embryo transfers, there were no differences. Blastocyst embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were large for gestational age, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were small for gestational age.
机译:背景技术对于由囊胚转移或卵裂状态胚胎转移获得的单胎婴儿而言,比较新生儿结局存在争议。许多研究得出了矛盾的结果。我们进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,目的是比较IVF / ICSI后单胎新生儿的结局。方法直到2016年10月,我们一直在Medline,Embase和Cochrane临床试验中央注册数据库(CCTR)中进行搜索。研究和试验包括单胎婴儿的新生儿结局。数据提取在2×2表中。使用Rev Man 5.1软件进行分析。以95%的置信区间计算风险比(RRs)和风险差异,以评估每个结果的结果。将亚组应用于所有结果。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)清单用于评估参考研究的质量。结果十二项研究符合该荟萃分析的标准。胚泡胚胎移植后早产的风险高于卵裂期转移后的早产风险(RR:1.11,95%CI:1.01-1.22)。对于“唯一新鲜的”亚组,结果是一致的(RR:1.16,95%CI:1.06-1.27)。对于“新鲜和冷冻”和“仅冷冻”子组,没有差异。接受新鲜胚泡胚胎移植的患者极早产的风险很高(RR:1.16,95%CI:1.02-1.31)。最后,卵裂期的胚胎移植与胎龄小的婴儿的高风险(0.83,95%CI:0.76-0.92)和胎龄大的婴儿的低风险(1.14,95%CI)相关。 :1.04–1.25)。结论新鲜的胚泡移植后早产和非常早产的风险要比新的卵裂期胚胎移植后高。但是,在冷冻胚胎移植中,没有差异。胚泡胚胎移植导致高胎龄婴儿的高风险,卵裂期胚胎移植导致高胎龄婴儿的高风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号