...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica: Official Publication of the Nordisk Forening for Obstetrik och Gynekologi >Shock index thresholds to predict adverse outcomes in maternal hemorrhage and sepsis: A prospective cohort study
【24h】

Shock index thresholds to predict adverse outcomes in maternal hemorrhage and sepsis: A prospective cohort study

机译:休克指数阈值预测孕产妇出血和败血症的不良结果:潜在的队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Introduction Shock index ( SI ) is a predictor of hemodynamic compromise in obstetric patients. The SI threshold for action is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate SI thresholds as predictors of outcomes in obstetric patients. Material and methods We undertook a prospective cohort study at three South African hospitals of women with postpartum hemorrhage (n?=?283) or maternal sepsis (n?=?126) . The “first” and “worst” SI following diagnosis were recorded. SI was compared with conventional vital signs as predictors of outcomes. The performance of SI .9, SI .9‐1.69 and SI ≥1.7 to predict outcomes (maternal death; Critical Care Unit admission; major procedure; hysterectomy) and hemorrhage‐specific outcomes (lowest hemoglobin 70?g/l; blood transfusion ≥4?IU) were evaluated. Results “First” SI was one of two best performing vital signs for every outcome in postpartum hemorrhage and sepsis. In hemorrhage, risk of all outcomes increased with increasing “first” SI ; for blood transfusion ≥4?IU odds ratio was 4.24 (95% confidence interval 1.25‐14.36) for SI ≥1.7 vs SI .9‐1.69. In sepsis, risk of all outcomes increased with increasing “worst” SI . Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of “first” SI .9 vs SI ≥.9 for maternal death were 100.0%, 55.2%, 4.6% and 100.0%, respectively, in hemorrhage and 80.0%, 50.4%, 12.3% and 96.7%, respectively, in sepsis. Conclusions The shock index was a consistent predictor of outcomes compared with conventional vital signs in postpartum hemorrhage and sepsis. SI .9 performed well as a rule‐out test and SI .9‐1.69 and SI ≥1.7 indicated increased risk of all outcomes in both cohorts. These thresholds may alert to the need for urgent intervention and prevent maternal deaths.
机译:摘要引入冲击指数(SI)是产科患者血液动力学妥协的预测因子。行动的SI阈值并不了解。我们旨在评估SI阈值作为产科患者结果的预测因子。材料和方法我们在产后出血(N?= 283)或母体败血症(n?= 126)中,在南非妇女的三个南非医院进行了一项潜在的队列研究。记录了“第一”和“最糟糕的”Si。将Si与传统的生命身份进行比较,作为结果的预测因素。 Si& .9,si .9-1.69和si≥1.7的性能预测结果(孕产妇死亡;关键护理单位入场;主要程序;子宫切除术)和出血特异性结果(最低血红蛋白70?g / l ;评估了输血≥4型IU)。结果“首先”Si是产后出血和败血症中每种结果的两个最佳生命体征之一。在出血中,所有结果的风险都随着“首先”Si而增加;对于SI≥1.7Vs,IU差距为4.24(95%置信区间1.25-14.36).9-1.69。在败血症中,随着“最糟糕的”Si,所有结果的风险都会增加。 “首次”Si&lt中的敏感性,特异性,正面和消极预测值分别为孕产妇死亡,出血和80.0%,50.4%,分别为100.0%,55.2%,4.6%和100.0%,50.0%,在败血症中分别为12.3%和96.7%。结论与产后出血和败血症中的常规生命症状相比,冲击指数是结果的一致预测因素。 Si& .9作为排列测试,Si.9-1.69和Si≥1.7表明两种队列中所有结果的风险增加。这些门槛可能会提醒迫切性干预并防止产妇死亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号