首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Meta-Analysis Evaluating Calcium Channel Blockers and the Risk of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With Hypertension
【24h】

Meta-Analysis Evaluating Calcium Channel Blockers and the Risk of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With Hypertension

机译:荟萃分析评估钙通道阻滞剂和高血压患者外周血动脉疾病的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Clinical studies have shown that calcium channel blockers (CCB) can mitigate the progression of atherosclerosis. Their role in the primary prevention of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCT) to compare the impact of CCB on the incidence of PAD in patients with hypertension. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in PubMed and Cochrane registry. Studies were included if they were RCT and had outcome data on PAD with a follow-up duration of at least 6 months. CCB formed the intervention group, whereas the control group was constituted by either placebo or active treatment with any of the other antihypertensive medications. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and we report odds ratio as a measure of treatment effect. Our search identified 934 trials, of which 7 RCTs with 71,971 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.8 years. In patients receiving CCB, PAD events occurred in 547 out of 27,502 patients (2%) compared with 1,263 out of 42,659 patients in the control group (3%). Based on the random-effect model, the odds for development of PAD in hypertensive patients treated with CCB compared with the control group was 0.70 (95% confidence interval of 0.58 to 0.86, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, this meta-analysis of RCTs of hypertensive patients, we found that treatment with CCB was strongly associated with a decrease in the PAD compared with other antihypertensive agents or placebo. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:临床研究表明,钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)可以减轻动脉粥样硬化的进展。它们在初步预防外周血动脉疾病(垫)中的作用尚不清楚。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,以比较CCB对高血压患者垫发病率的影响。在PubMed和Cochrane登记处进行了对文献的全面审查。如果它们是RCT,则包括研究,并在垫上进行了结果数据,后续持续时间至少为6个月。 CCB形成干预组,而对照组由任何其他抗高血压药物的安慰剂或活性治疗组成。进行随机效应的Meta分析,我们向治疗效果的量度报告了差异。我们的搜索确定了934项试验,其中7个RCT,71,971名患者履行了纳入标准。随访的平均持续时间为3.8岁。在接受CCB的患者中,27,502名患者中的547例(2%)发生垫事件,而对照组42,659名患者中有1,263名(3%)。基于随机效应模型,与对照组对照组对照组治疗的高血压患者垫中垫的赔率为0.70(置信区间为0.58至0.86,p = 0.0005)。总之,对于高血压患者RCT的这种荟萃分析,我们发现用CCB治疗与垫子的减少与其他抗高血压剂或安慰剂相比强烈相关。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号