首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cytologica: The Journal of Clinical Cytology and Cytopathology >Diagnosis of follicular neoplasm in thyroid nodules by fine needle aspiration cytology: does the result, benign vs. suspicious for a malignant process, in these nodules make a difference?
【24h】

Diagnosis of follicular neoplasm in thyroid nodules by fine needle aspiration cytology: does the result, benign vs. suspicious for a malignant process, in these nodules make a difference?

机译:通过细针穿刺细胞学检查诊断甲状腺结节中的滤泡性肿瘤:这些结节是否有益于良性或可疑恶性结节?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To address the likelihood of thyroid malignancy for each cytologic interpretation, highly cellular and benign vs. follicular carcinoma, with particular attention to the indeterminate cytologic result, follicular neoplasm. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed thyroid nodule cytologic and histologic interpretations from 1994 to 2002 in a tertiary medical center setting. Patients were referred for evaluation of thyroid nodules found incidentally or on physical examination. RESULTS: A total of 886 thyroid nodules were aspirated in 802 patients (500 benign, 195 indeterminate, 129 inadequate, 62 malignant). Of 195 indeterminate lesions, 180 were classified as follicular neoplasm or "cannot rule out/possible" follicular neoplasm, with 144 of these ultimately removed and with malignant histologic findings in 28. Any mention of follicular neoplasm in the cytology report conferred a 19.4% risk of malignancy in patients who went on to surgery (including an unexpected 18.2% rate of malignancy in the subcategory in which a possible follicular neoplasm was a secondary listing in an otherwise-benign cytologic differential diagnosis). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the likelihood of histologic malignancy between the cytologic subcategories of "definite "follicular neoplasm and "cannot rule out/possible" follicular neoplasm. We recommend that cytologic reports on fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules with a diagnosis of follicular neoplasm reflect this fact.
机译:目的:为解决每种细胞学解释(高度细胞性和良性与滤泡性癌)的甲状腺恶性肿瘤的可能性,尤其要注意不确定的细胞学结果,滤泡性肿瘤。研究设计:我们回顾性回顾了1994年至2002年在三级医疗中心设置的甲状腺结节的细胞学和组织学解释。将患者转诊以评估偶然发现或经身体检查发现的甲状腺结节。结果:802例患者共吸出886个甲状腺结节(500例良性,195例不确定,129例不足,62例恶性)。在195个不确定的病变中,有180个被分类为滤泡性肿瘤或“不能排除/可能的”滤泡性肿瘤,其中144个最终被清除,在28个中有恶性组织学发现。细胞学报告中提及滤泡性肿瘤的风险为19.4%接受手术治疗的患者的恶性肿瘤总数(包括子类别中意想不到的18.2%恶性率,其中在其他方面良性的细胞学鉴别诊断中,可能的滤泡性肿瘤是次要的)。结论:在“确定的”滤泡性肿瘤和“不能排除/可能的”滤泡性肿瘤的细胞学亚类之间,组织学恶性的可能性没有差异。我们建议有关甲状腺结节细针穿刺并诊断为滤泡性肿瘤的细胞学报告应反映这一事实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号