首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sound and Vibration >Comparison of two low-order models for the prediction of fan broadband noise
【24h】

Comparison of two low-order models for the prediction of fan broadband noise

机译:两个低阶模型预测风扇宽带噪声的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two low-order methods for predicting the broadband noise downstream of a fan exit guide vane (FEGV) due to interaction with rotor wake turbulence are compared. The noise is predicted with a two-step approach in each method. The methods share the exact same first step. The unsteady vane surface pressure is computed using a strip approach. At each strip, the 2D flat-plate cascade response to a gust in the wave-number, frequency domain is calculated. An integral approach is used for this calculation. The two methods then differ in the second step. One method integrates the unsteady surface pressure together with the Green's function for a cylindrical annulus to obtain the downstream duct acoustic pressure modes. The other method computes rectilinear acoustic modes relevant to the cascade at each strip. In the second method, the total power is obtained by adding the acoustic power downstream of each strip. Both methods neglect mean flow swirl effects on acoustic propagation. The fan broadband noise workshop RC1 and FC2 cases are used as a platform to compare the two methods. When the FEGV inflow turbulent parameters are taken from different sources (e.g. hot-wire, CFD) the predictions from both methods respond similarly. The trends predicted with both methods based on turbulence level or rotor speed are similar. The trends with vane count predicted by the two methods do not match and it is unclear which prediction is correct. The actual spectrum predicted by the Green's function method for all of the cases is shown to be slightly closer to experimental results. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:相比,两个用于预测风扇出口导向叶片(FEGV)下游的宽带噪声的低阶方法,由于与转子唤醒湍流相互作用。在每种方法中以两步方法预测噪声。该方法共享完全相同的第一步。使用条带方法计算不稳定的叶片表面压力。在每个条带上,计算频域中的阵风的2D平板级联响应响应。对该计算使用积分方法。两种方法在第二步中不同。一种方法将不稳定的表面压力与绿色的函数一起集成在一起,用于圆柱形环,以获得下游管道声压模式。另一个方法计算与每个条带的级联相关的直线声模式。在第二种方法中,通过在每个条带的下游添加声功率来获得总功率。这两种方法都忽略了对声学传播的平均旋流效应。风扇宽带噪声研讨会RC1和FC2案例用作比较两种方法的平台。当FEGV流入湍流参数取自不同来源时(例如热线,CFD),两种方法的预测类似地响应。基于湍流水平或转子速度的两种方法预测的趋势是相似的。通过这两种方法预测的叶片计数的趋势不匹配,并且不清楚哪种预测是正确的。对于所有案例的绿色功能方法预测的实际频谱显示为实验结果略近。 (c)2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号