首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of topically administered azelastine, sodium cromoglycate and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhino-conjunctivitis.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of topically administered azelastine, sodium cromoglycate and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhino-conjunctivitis.

机译:局部给药氮卓斯汀,色甘酸钠和安慰剂在季节性变应性结膜炎和鼻结膜炎治疗中的疗效和耐受性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective and setting: Azelastine (AZE) in a novel, eye drop, formulation, was compared with topically applied sodium cromoglycate (SCG) and placebo (PLA) in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhino-conjunctivitis in a multicentre, parallel group study. Research design: 144 subjects ranging in age from 16 to 65 years participated. All had at least a 2-year history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and were symptomatic at the time of inclusion. Medications were administered topically either twice daily (AZE/PLA) or four times daily (SCG) over a 2-week treatment period. Method and outcome measures: Azelastine and placebo were compared double-blind; the comparison versus SCG was carried out in an open manner. Itching, redness, flow of tears, eyelid swelling, foreign-body sensation, photophobia, soreness and discharge were scored on a 4-point severity scale. RESULTS: Results for the decrease of main conjunctivitis symptoms (itching, tearing and conjunctival redness) showed a marked effect for both active treatments on day 3 with a sustained improvement on days 7 and 14. A clear response to treatment (an improvement of sum scores for day 3 of >/=3 points compared to baseline) occurred in 85.4% of azelastine-treated patients, 83.0% of sodium cromoglycate patients and 56.3% of placebo patients. Response rates for both active treatments were statistically superior to those for placebo (azelastine p = 0.005; sodium cromoglycate p = 0.007). Global assessment of efficacy was at least 'satisfactory' for 90.0% of azelastine patients, 81.3% of sodium cromoglycate patients and 66.3% of placebo-treated patients. The most frequent adverse effects were transient application site reactions which tended to disappear with increasing duration of treatment, and, less frequently, taste perversion. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the therapeutic use of azelastine eye drops in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhino-conjunctivitis can be recommended.
机译:目的和背景:在多中心平行组研究中,将一种新颖的滴眼剂氮卓斯汀(AZE)与局部应用的色甘酸钠(SCG)和安慰剂(PLA)进行了比较,以治疗季节性变应性结膜炎或鼻结膜炎。研究设计:144位年龄在16至65岁之间的受试者参加了研究。所有患者均至少有2年的季节性过敏性结膜炎病史,入组时有症状。在2周的治疗期内,每天两次(AZE / PLA)或每天四次(SCG)局部给药。方法和结果指标:将氮卓斯汀和安慰剂进行双盲比较。与SCG的比较以开放的方式进行。瘙痒,发红,流泪,眼睑肿胀,异物感,畏光,酸痛和分泌物按4分严重程度评分。结果:主要结膜炎症状(瘙痒,撕裂和结膜发红)减少的结果显示,两种有效治疗在第3天都有显着效果,在第7天和第14天持续改善。对治疗的明确反应(总分得到改善)在第3天,与基线相比> / = 3分的患者)发生率为85.4%,接受氮卓斯汀治疗的患者,83.0%的色甘酸钠患者和56.3%的安慰剂患者。两种有效治疗的缓解率在统计学上均优于安慰剂(氮卓斯汀p = 0.005;色甘酸钠p = 0.007)。对90.0%的氮卓斯汀患者,81.3%的色甘酸钠患者和66.3%的安慰剂治疗患者,疗效的总体评估至少“令人满意”。最常见的不良反应是短暂的应用部位反应,随着治疗持续时间的增加,这种反应往往会消失,而味觉变态的频率则降低。结论:本研究结果表明,推荐使用氮卓斯汀滴眼液治疗季节性变应性结膜炎或鼻-结膜炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号