首页> 外文期刊>Biometrical Journal >Evaluation of Animal Carcinogenicity Studies: Cochran-Armitage Trend Test vs. Multiple Contrast Tests
【24h】

Evaluation of Animal Carcinogenicity Studies: Cochran-Armitage Trend Test vs. Multiple Contrast Tests

机译:动物致癌性研究评估:Cochran斜率趋势测试与多重对比测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Typical animal carcinogenicity studies involve the comparison of several dose groups to a negative control. The uncorrected asymptotic Cochran-Armitage trend test with equally spaced dose scores is the most frequently used test in such set-ups. However, this test based on a weighted linear regression on proportions. It is well known that the Cochran-Armitage test lacks in power for other shapes than the assumed linear one. Therefore, dichotomous multiple contrast tests are introduced. These build the maximum over several single contrasts, where each of them is chosen appropriately to cover a specific dose-response shape. An extensive power study has been conducted to compare multiple contrast tests with the approaches used so far. Crucial results will be presented in this paper. Moreover, exact tests and continuity corrected versions are introduced and compared to the traditional uncorrected approaches regarding size and power behaviour. A trend test for any shape of the dose-response relationship for either crude tumour rates or mortality- adjusted rates based on the simple Poly-3 transformation is proposed for evaluation of carcinogenicity studies.
机译:典型的动物致癌性研究涉及将几个剂量组与阴性对照进行比较。在这种情况下,使用等距剂量分数的未经校正的渐近Cochran-Armitage趋势检验是最常用的检验。但是,该测试基于比例的加权线性回归。众所周知,除了假定的线性形状外,Cochran-Armitage检验对于其他形状也缺乏功效。因此,引入了二分式多重对比测试。这些在几个单一的对比中建立了最大值,其中的每个对比都经过适当选择以覆盖特定的剂量反应形状。进行了广泛的功效研究,以将多种对比测试与迄今为止使用的方法进行比较。重要结果将在本文中介绍。此外,引入了精确的测试和经连续性校正的版本,并将其与关于尺寸和功率行为的传统未经校正的方法进行了比较。为评估致癌性研究,提出了基于简单Poly-3转化的任何形式的针对原始肿瘤发生率或死亡率调整率的剂量反应关系的趋势测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号