...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Fluids >Comparison of three simulation methods for colloidal aggregates in Stokes flow: Finite elements, lattice Boltzmann and Stokesian dynamics
【24h】

Comparison of three simulation methods for colloidal aggregates in Stokes flow: Finite elements, lattice Boltzmann and Stokesian dynamics

机译:斯托克斯流中三种胶体聚集体模拟方法的比较:有限元,格子玻尔兹曼和斯托克斯动力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dilute suspensions of colloidal aggregates of two different types are investigated numerically by three different methods; Stokesian dynamics (SD), the finite element method (FEM) and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). The Navier-Stokes equations are solved in the zero-Reynolds-number limit, and the fluid forces acting on particles within the aggregates as well as the aggregates' influence on the fluid flow are evaluated by the discrete methods. Two fluid-flow profiles are considered; uniform plug flow and linear shear flow. The paper compares three methods in their own typical simulation environment. Thus, the results may provide practical guidelines on which methods to chose for certain accuracy requirements.
机译:通过三种不同的方法对两种不同类型的胶体聚集体的稀悬液进行了数值研究。斯托克斯动力学(SD),有限元方法(FEM)和晶格玻尔兹曼方法(LBM)。 Navier-Stokes方程在零雷诺数极限条件下求解,并且通过离散方法评估了作用在骨料中的颗粒上的流体力以及骨料对流体流动的影响。考虑了两个流体流动曲线;均匀的活塞流和线性剪切流。本文在自己的典型仿真环境中比较了三种方法。因此,结果可以提供有关针对特定精度要求选择哪种方法的实用指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号