...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of traumatic stress >A Comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Traumatized Refugees
【24h】

A Comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Traumatized Refugees

机译:DSM-5和DSM-IV诊断标准的创伤后难民创伤后应激障碍的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence rate and factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on the diagnostic criteria of the fourth and fifth editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, , ) in traumatized refugees. There were 134 adult treatment-seeking, severely and multiply traumatized patients from various refugee backgrounds were assessed in their mother tongue using a computerized set of questionnaires consisting of a trauma list, the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale, and the new PTSD items that had been suggested by the DSM-5 Task Force of the American Psychiatric Association. Using DSM-IV, 60.4% of participants met diagnostic criteria for PTSD; using DSM-5, only 49.3% fulfilled all criteria (p < .001). Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 items showed good and comparable model fits. Furthermore, classification functions in the DSM-5 were satisfactory. The new Cluster D symptoms showed relatively high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power. The DSM-5 symptom structure appears to be applicable to traumatized refugees. Negative alterations in cognitions and mood may be especially useful for clinicians, not only to determine the extent to which an individual refugee is likely to meet criteria for PTSD, but also in providing targets for clinical intervention.
机译:这项研究的目的是根据《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》第四版和第五版(DSM-IV; DSM-5; DSM-5)的诊断标准,比较创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患病率和因素结构。美国精神病学协会,,)在受难的难民中。使用计算机化的问卷调查表对134位来自不同难民背景的成年人寻求治疗,重度和多重创伤患者进行了母语评估,这些问卷包括创伤清单,创伤后诊断量表和由PTSD建议的新PTSD项目。美国精神病学协会的DSM-5工作组。使用DSM-IV,有60.4%的参与者符合PTSD的诊断标准;使用DSM-5,只有49.3%的人符合所有标准(p <.001)。 DSM-IV和DSM-5项目的验证性因子分析显示良好且可比的模型拟合。此外,DSM-5中的分类功能令人满意。新的簇D症状表现出较高的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测能力和阴性预测能力。 DSM-5症状结构似乎适用于受难的难民。认知和情绪的负面变化可能对临床医生特别有用,不仅可以确定单个难民可能达到PTSD标准的程度,而且可以为临床干预提供目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号