...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopathology >Did the DSM-5 Improve the Traumatic Stressor Criterion?: Association of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criterion A with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms
【24h】

Did the DSM-5 Improve the Traumatic Stressor Criterion?: Association of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criterion A with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms

机译:DSM-5是否改善了创伤应激源标准?:DSM-IV和DSM-5标准A的协会,具有创伤性应激障碍症状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: A recent meta-analysis found that DSM-III- and DSM-IV-defined traumas were associated with only slightly higher posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms than nontraumatic stressors. The current study is the first to examine whether DSM-5-defined traumas were associated with higher levels of PTSD than DSM-IV-defined traumas. Further, we examined theoretically relevant event characteristics to determine whether characteristics other than those outlined in the DSM could predict PTSD symptoms. Method: One hundred six women who had experienced a trauma or significant stressor completed questionnaires assessing PTSD, depression, impairment, and event characteristics. Events were rated for whether they qualified as DSM-IV and DSM-5 trauma. Results: There were no significant differences between DSM-IV-defined traumas and stressors. For DSM-5, effect sizes were slightly larger but still nonsignificant (except for significantly higher hyperarousal following traumas vs. stressors). Self-reported fear for one's life significantly predicted PTSD symptoms. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the current DSM-5 definition of trauma, although a slight improvement from DSM-IV, is not highly predictive of who develops PTSD symptoms. Our study also indicates the importance of individual perception of life threat in the prediction of PTSD. (c) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:目的:最近的荟萃分析发现,DSM-III和DSM-IV定义的创伤与非创伤性压力源仅稍高的创伤性应激障碍(PTSD)症状有关。目前的研究是第一个检查DSM-5定义的创伤是否与较高水平的PTSD相关的pTSD比DSM-IV定义的创伤。此外,我们检查了理论上相关的事件特征,以确定除DSM中概述的特征是否可以预测应激症状。方法:一百六名经历了创伤或重大压力座的六名妇女完成了评估应投灾,抑郁,损害和事件特征的问卷。是否有资格作为DSM-IV和DSM-5创伤的活动。结果:DSM-IV定义的创伤和压力源之间没有显着差异。对于DSM-5,效果尺寸略大,但仍然是无情的(除了创伤后的超慢性较高,除了基于压力频范围内的显着更高)。对一个人的生命的自我报告的恐惧显着预测了可行的应激障碍。结论:我们的结果表明,目前的DSM-5对创伤的定义,虽然来自DSM-IV的轻微改善,但不能高度预测谁发展应激障碍症状。我们的研究还表明,个人对终身威胁的重要性在预测PTSD的重要性。 (c)2017年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号