...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Who benefits more from higher household consumption? The intra-household allocation of nutrients in China.
【24h】

Who benefits more from higher household consumption? The intra-household allocation of nutrients in China.

机译:谁从较高的家庭消费中受益更多?中国家庭内部营养分配。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous studies find that human capital investments in boys are less income elastic than investments in girls, attributing this result to favoritism toward boys. I show theoretically that it is plausible for more productive or favored household members to have higher income elasticities. I then investigate this question empirically, utilizing panel data on individual nutrient intake from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) to analyze how changes in household per-capita nutrient intake affect the intra-household allocation of nutrients. To deal with potential biases due to omitted variables and simultaneity, I use measures of rainfall variation as instruments. I find that nutritional intakes are more elastic for males (especially prime-age men) than for females, and significantly less elastic for the elderly.
机译:先前的研究发现,对男孩的人力资本投资不如对女孩的投资具有更大的收入弹性,这将这一结果归因于对男孩的偏爱。我从理论上证明,生产能力更高或偏爱的家庭成员具有较高的收入弹性是合理的。然后,我利用来自中国健康与营养调查(CHNS)的单个养分摄入量的面板数据,以经验方式调查此问题,以分析家庭人均养分摄入量的变化如何影响家庭内部养分分配。为了处理由于遗漏变量和同时性而导致的潜在偏差,我使用降雨变化量度作为工具。我发现,男性(尤其是成年男性)的营养摄入量比女性更具弹性,而老年人的弹性则明显不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号