首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Double Kissing Crush With Provisional Stenting for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Results From the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) Trial.
【24h】

A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Double Kissing Crush With Provisional Stenting for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Results From the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) Trial.

机译:DKCRUSH-II(双吻挤压与临时支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变)试验结果比较了双吻挤压术与临时支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的随机临床研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions after double kissing double crush (DK crush) or provisional stenting (PS) techniques. BACKGROUND: Provisional side branch (SB) stenting is preferable to DK crush because it has been associated with fewer complications. It is unknown which strategy would provide the best results. METHODS: From April 2007 to June 2009, 370 unselected patients with coronary bifurcation lesions from 7 Asian centers were randomly assigned to either the DK or the PS group. Additional SB stenting in PS was required if final results were suboptimal. The primary end point was the occurrence of MACE at 12 months, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary end point was the angiographic restenosis at 8 months. RESULTS: There were 3 procedural occlusions of SB in the PS group. At 8 months, angiographic restenosis rates in the main vessel and SB were significantly different between the DK (3.8% and 4.9%) and the PS groups (9.7% and 22.2%, p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively). Additional SB stenting in the PS group was required in 28.6% of lesions. TVR was 6.5% in the DK group, occurring significantly less often than in the PS group (14.6%, p = 0.017). There were nonsignificant differences in MACE and definite stent thrombosis between the DK (10.3% and 2.2%) and PS groups (17.3%, and 0.5%, p = 0.070 and p = 0.372, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: DK crush was associated with a significant reduction of TLR and TVR in this unselected patient population. However, there was no significant difference in MACE between DK and the PS groups. (Randomized Study on DK Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions; ChicTR-TRC-00000015).
机译:目的:本研究旨在调查在两次接吻双挤压(DKrush)或临时支架置入(PS)技术后冠状动脉分叉病变患者在12个月时主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的差异。背景:临时侧支(SB)支架优于DK粉碎,因为它与较少的并发症相关。未知哪种策略可以提供最佳结果。方法:从2007年4月至2009年6月,将来自7个亚洲中心的370例未选出的冠状动脉分叉病变患者随机分为DK组或PS组。如果最终结果不理想,则需要在PS中额外使用SB支架。主要终点是在12个月时发生MACE,包括心脏死亡,心肌梗塞或靶血管血运重建(TVR)。次要终点是8个月时的血管造影再狭窄。结果:PS组有3例SB的手术闭塞。在8个月时,DK组(3.8%和4.9%)和PS组之间主血管和SB的血管造影再狭窄率显着不同(分别为9.7%和22.2%,p = 0.036和p <0.001)。 PS组中28.6%的病变需要额外的SB支架。 DK组的TVR为6.5%,发生频率明显低于PS组(14.6%,p = 0.017)。 DK组(10.3%和2.2%)和PS组(分别为17.3%和0.5%,分别为p = 0.070和p = 0.372)在MACE和明确的支架内血栓形成方面无显着差异。结论:在这个未选择的患者人群中,DK压抑与TLR和TVR的显着降低有关。但是,DK组和PS组之间的MACE没有显着差异。 (DK Crush技术与临时支架技术在冠状动脉分叉病变中的随机研究; ChicTR-TRC-00000015)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号