首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study.
【24h】

Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study.

机译:真正冠状动脉分岔粉碎技术随机研究真正的冠状动脉分支:仙人掌(冠状动脉分叉:用Sirolimus洗脱支架的应用)研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents have been reported to be effective in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Still, it has not been fully clarified which strategy would provide the best results with true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CACTUS trial (Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing 2 different techniques of stenting, with mandatory final kissing-balloon inflation, in true bifurcations: (1) elective "crush" stenting and (2) stenting of only the main branch, with provisional side-branch T-stenting. From August 2004 to June 2007, 350 patients were enrolled in 12 European centers. The primary angiographic end point was the in-segment restenosis rate, and the primary clinical end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization) at 6 months. At 6 months, angiographic restenosis rates were not different between the crush group (4.6% and 13.2% in the main branch and side branch, respectively) and the provisional stenting group (6.7% and 14.7% in the main branch and side branch, respectively; P=NS). Additional stenting on the side branch in the provisional stenting group was required in 31% of lesions. Rates of major adverse cardiac events were also similar in the 2 groups (15.8% in the crush group versus 15% in the provisional stenting group, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: In most bifurcations with a significant stenosis in both branches, a provisional strategy of stenting the main branch only is effective, with the need to implant a second stent on the side branch occurring in approximately one third of cases. The implantation of 2 stents does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 6 months.
机译:背景:据报道,Sirolimus洗脱支架在治疗冠状动脉分叉的情况下是有效的。尽管如此,它尚未完全澄清哪种策略将提供真正的分叉病变的最佳效果。方法和结果:仙人掌试验(冠状动脉分叉:使用西罗司 - 洗脱支架的破碎技术应用)是一项前瞻性,随机的多中心研究,比较了2种不同的支架技术,具有强制性最终接吻 - 气球通货膨胀,真实的分支:( 1)选择“粉碎”支架和(2)只有主要分支的支架,具有临时侧分支T-支架。 2004年8月至2007年6月,350名欧洲中心注册了350名患者。原发性血管造影终点是分段再狭窄率,主要临床终点是在6个月内发生主要不良心脏事件(心脏病死亡,心脏死亡或靶血管血运重建)的发生。在6个月时,抑制基团之间的血管造影速率和分别在临时支架组(主要分支和侧分支中的6.7%和14.7%,分别为6.7%和14.7% ; p = ns)。在临时支架组中的侧枝上额外支撑在31%的病变中需要。主要不良心脏事件的速率在2组中也相似(粉碎组15.8%,临时支架组的15%,P = NS)。结论:在两个分支机构中具有显着狭窄的大多数分叉,仅抵销主要分支的临时策略是有效的,需要在大约三分之一的情况下植入侧分支的第二支架。 2个支架的植入似乎与6个月的不良事件的发病率较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号