首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Scale Comparability Between Nonaccommodated and Accommodated Forms of a Statewide High School Assessment: Using l(z) Person-Fit
【24h】

Scale Comparability Between Nonaccommodated and Accommodated Forms of a Statewide High School Assessment: Using l(z) Person-Fit

机译:州高中评估的非住宿形式和住宿形式之间的规模可比性:使用l(z)人适合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Differential item/test functioning (DIF/DTF) are routine procedures to detect item/test unfairness as an explanation for group performance difference. However, unequal sample sizes and small sample sizes have an impact on the statistical power of the DIF/DTF detection procedures. Furthermore, DIF/DTF cannot be used for two test forms without common items. One of the advantages of person-fit analysis (PFA) is that even with small sample sizes, and/or no common items, PFA can still be utilized to investigate whether different subgroups are on the same scale. This study used simulation data and empirical data from a large-scale state high school assessment to demonstrate test fairness between nonaccommodated and accommodated forms. The results of this study showed that the accommodated form was comparable with the nonaccommodated form within the same construct, and PFA performs well for scale comparability purposes regardless of the size of the subgroups and number of common items.
机译:差异项/测试功能(DIF / DTF)是检测项/测试不公平性的常规程序,以解释组性能差异。但是,不相等的样本大小和较小的样本大小会影响DIF / DTF检测过程的统计能力。此外,如果没有共同的项目,DIF / DTF不能用于两种测试表格。拟人分析(PFA)的优点之一是,即使样本量较小和/或没有共同项目,PFA仍可用于调查不同亚组是否处于相同规模。这项研究使用了来自大型州立高中评估的模拟数据和经验数据来证明非住宿形式和住宿形式之间的测试公平性。这项研究的结果表明,在同一结构中,可容纳的形式与未容纳的形式具有可比性,并且无论子组的大小和常见项目的数量如何,PFA都能很好地实现规模可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号