【24h】

Treatment of proximal hypospadias with a tubularized island flap urethroplasty and the onlay technique: a comparative study.

机译:管状岛状皮瓣尿道成形术和嵌体技术治疗近端尿道下裂:一项比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The onlay island flap urethroplasty was first described in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias. Since then, this technique has been increasingly used in more severe cases of hypospadias, because of the complications of tubularized flaps, mainly megaurethra and proximal anastomotic strictures. The aim of this study was to compare the morbidity of these 2 techniques. METHODS: Between April 1994 and December 1998, 80 patients underwent surgical treatment for hypospadias. A tubularized island flap (Ducketttechnique) was performed in 42 cases, and the onlay island flap technique was used in 38 patients. The authors retrospectively compared the complication rate and type of these 2 procedures. RESULTS: Altogether, fistula was the most frequent complication without any significant difference between the 2 groups (21.4% for Duckett technique and 18.4% for onlay repair; P > .05). However, the anastomotic stricture was much more common in the tubularized flap group (7.14% v 2.63%; P < .05). Moreover, a megaurethra was found only in the Duckett technique group (4.7%). There was no case of chordee recurrence, but 6 patients (15.7%) treated with the onlay technique required urethrolysis including dissection of the chord behind the urethral plate, and in the other 3 patients of the same group (7.9%), a dorsal Nesbit plication also was necessary. In all these cases, the urethroplasty included an island cutaneous flap to provide ventral coverage to the neourethra. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that both techniques present similar complications. However, proximal strictures and megaurethra are more common after the Duckett technique. This procedure is of choice in patients with scrotal hypospadias. Conversely, the onlay repair should be completed with other procedures (urethrolysis, dorsal Nesbit plication) to obtain good results in patients with severe degree of chordee.
机译:背景/目的:岛上皮瓣尿道成形术首先描述于中,远期阴茎尿道下裂的修复中。从那时起,由于管状皮瓣的并发症(主要是大尿道和近端吻合口狭窄),这种技术已越来越多地用于尿道下裂更严重的病例。这项研究的目的是比较这两种技术的发病率。方法:1994年4月至1998年12月,有80例接受了尿道下裂手术治疗。进行管状小岛状皮瓣(Ducketttechnique)42例,并使用覆盖岛状皮瓣技术38例。作者回顾性地比较了这两种手术的并发症发生率和类型。结果:瘘管是最常见的并发症,两组之间无显着差异(Duckett技术为21.4%,上颌修补术为18.4%; P> .05)。然而,吻合口狭窄在管状皮瓣组中更为普遍(7.14%vs 2.63%; P <.05)。此外,仅在Duckett技术组中发现了大尿道(4.7%)。没有脊柱复发的病例,但有6例(15.7%)的采用嵌体技术治疗的患者需要进行尿道溶解,包括在尿道板后切开弦;在同一组的其他3例患者中(7.9%),有背侧Nesbit重复也是必要的。在所有这些情况下,尿道成形术均包括岛状皮瓣,以覆盖新尿道的腹侧。结论:作者得出结论,两种技术均具有相似的并发症。但是,采用Duckett技术后,近端狭窄和大尿道更常见。阴囊尿道下裂的患者可以选择这种方法。相反,应使用其他程序(尿道溶解,背Nesbit褶皱)完成上颌修复术,以在严重脊索病患者中获得良好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号