首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Behavior >Truth isn't everything: Promoting aesthetically guided choice in mathematical work
【24h】

Truth isn't everything: Promoting aesthetically guided choice in mathematical work

机译:真理不是万能的:在数学工作中促进美学指导的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most educational and philosophical thought about mathematics focuses on the logical structure of the subject and considers mathematicians and students to be people whose primary practices are verifying statements within this structure. We claim that acts of discernment -careful choices driven by aesthetic considerations - are as important as acts of verification in mathematical work. This paper offers a conceptualization of this "aesthetically guided choice" that differentiates between three interrelated acts of discernment: nominating ideas, arranging ideas, and balancing ideas. We argue that aesthetically guided choice should be supported in school, and that such acts are notably lacking from the "Standards for Mathematical Practice" in the Common Core State Standards. This paper is the development of a theory at heart, built around rich descriptions of a mathematics class with middle school students, in which young thinkers were engaged in aesthetic choice. It includes analyses of the history of mathematics and studies of mathematical work to support claims about the nature of mathematics and to interpret the work of young mathematics learners from the perspective of mathematics as a discipline.
机译:关于数学的大多数教育和哲学思想都侧重于该学科的逻辑结构,并认为数学家和学生是其主要实践正在验证该结构中的陈述的人。我们声称,识别行为-由美学考虑驱动的谨慎选择-与数学工作中的验证行为同样重要。本文提供了这种“审美指导的选择”的概念化,该选择区分了三个相互关联的识别行为:提名思想,安排思想和平衡思想。我们认为,应该在学校中支持美学指导的选择,而《共同核心州标准》中的“数学实践标准”显然缺乏这种行为。本文是对内心理论的发展,它以对中学生数学课的丰富描述为基础,其中年轻思想家从事美学选择。它包括对数学历史的分析和对数学工作的研究,以支持有关数学性质的主张,并从数学作为一门学科的角度来解释年轻的数学学习者的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号