首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >Gasless laparoscopy-assisted versus open resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the upper stomach: preliminary results.
【24h】

Gasless laparoscopy-assisted versus open resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the upper stomach: preliminary results.

机译:无气腹腔镜辅助与开放性切除术治疗上胃胃肠道间质瘤:初步结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms with malignant potential. Surgery is the definitive management for resectable nonmetastatic lesions. Although minimally invasive resection has been established for GISTs, it is still considered unfeasible when tumors are near the esophagogastric junction. This study aimed to compare the relative efficacy of gasless laparoscopy-assisted (GLA) and open approaches for resection of GISTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2008, 28 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for upper GIST were reviewed retrospectively. Among these patients, 15 underwent GLA procedures and 13 underwent open surgeries. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, and tumor characteristics (mean tumor size and prognosis) were similar for both groups. All patients underwent wedge resection. The mean operating time (129.6 versus 110.8 minutes), mean estimated blood loss (35.5 versus 40.3 mL), mean day of first flatus (2.7 versus 3.2 days), mean tumor size (2.5 versus 2.6 cm), and tumor prognosis or complication rate (13.3% versus 7.7%) between the GLA and open surgery groups were not significantly different. The length of maximal wound (P < 0.001), visual analog scale on postoperative days 1 (P = 0.001), 2 (P = 0.001), and 3 (P = 0.001), the mean time for resuming oral intake (P = 0.028), and the length of hospital stay (P = 0.005) in the GLA group were significantly lesser than the corresponding values in the open surgery group. None of the patients had dysphagia or died. CONCLUSIONS: GLA method is a safe and feasible procedure for resecting GISTs of the upper stomach. In addition, it offers better cosmetic results, less pain, and faster recovery.
机译:简介:胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)是具有恶性潜能的罕见肿瘤。手术是可切除的非转移性病变的明确处理方法。尽管已建立了针对GIST的微创切除术,但当肿瘤靠近食管胃交界处时,仍被认为是不可行的。这项研究旨在比较无气腹腔镜辅助(GLA)和开放性GIST切除术的相对疗效。病人与方法:回顾性分析2006年1月至2008年12月间接受连续GIST手术治疗的28例患者。在这些患者中,有15例接受了GLA手术,而13例接受了开放手术。结果:两组患者的人口统计学,合并症和肿瘤特征(平均肿瘤大小和预后)相似。所有患者均行楔形切除术。平均手术时间(129.6 vs 110.8分钟),平均失血量(35.5 vs 40.3 mL),初次肠胃气胀的平均天数(2.7 vs 3.2天),平均肿瘤大小(2.5 cm vs 2.6 cm)以及肿瘤的预后或并发症发生率GLA组和开放手术组之间的差异(分别为13.3%和7.7%)没有显着差异。最大伤口的长度(P <0.001),术后第1天(P = 0.001),第2天(P = 0.001)和第3天(P = 0.001)的视觉模拟量表,恢复口腔摄入的平均时间(P = 0.028) ),GLA组的住院时间(P = 0.005)明显小于开放手术组的相应值。所有患者均无吞咽困难或死亡。结论:GLA法是切除上腹部GIST的一种安全可行的方法。此外,它提供了更好的美容效果,减轻了疼痛,恢复得更快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号