首页> 外文期刊>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: Official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology >Effects of the pelvic compression belt on gluteus medius, quadratus lumborum, and lumbar multifidus activities during side-lying hip abduction
【24h】

Effects of the pelvic compression belt on gluteus medius, quadratus lumborum, and lumbar multifidus activities during side-lying hip abduction

机译:侧卧髋关节外展时骨盆加压带对臀肌,腰方肌和腰椎多裂活动的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of the pelvic compression belt on the electromyographic (EMG) activities of gluteus medius (GM), quadratus lumborum (QL), and lumbar multifidus (LM) during side-lying hip abduction. Thirty-one volunteers (15 men and 16 women) with no history of pathology volunteered for this study. Subjects were instructed to perform hip abduction in side-lying position with and without applying the pelvic compression belt. The pelvic compression belt was adjusted just below the anterior superior iliac spines with the stabilizing pressure using elastic compression bands. Surface EMG data were collected from the GM, QL, and LM of the dominant limb. Significantly decreased EMG activity in the QL (without the pelvic compression belt, 60.19 ± 23.66% maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]; with the pelvic compression belt, 51.44 ± 23.00% MVIC) and significantly increased EMG activity in the GM (without the pelvic compression belt, 26.71 ± 12.88% MVIC; with the pelvic compression belt, 35.02 ± 18.28% MVIC) and in the LM (without the pelvic compression belt, 30.28 ± 14.60% MVIC; with the pelvic compression belt, 37.47 ± 18.94% MVIC) were found when the pelvic compression belt was applied (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences of the EMG activity between male and female subjects. The findings suggest that the pelvic compression belt may be helpful to prevent unwanted substitution movement during side-lying hip abduction, through increasing the GM and LM and decreasing the QL.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在侧卧髋关节外展期间骨盆压缩带对臀小肌(GM),腰quad(QL)和腰椎多裂症(LM)的肌电图(EMG)活性的影响。无病理史的31名志愿者(15名男性和16名女性)自愿参加了这项研究。指示受试者在有和没有应用骨盆压迫带的情况下以侧卧姿势进行髋关节外展。使用弹性压缩带,通过稳定压力将骨盆压缩带调整到just前上棘正下方。表面肌电图数据是从优势肢的GM,QL和LM收集的。 QL中的EMG活性显着降低(无骨盆压迫带,最大自愿等长收缩[MVIC]为60.19±23.66%;有骨盆压迫带,为51.44±23.00%MVIC),而GM(无骨盆压迫)中的EMG活性显着增加压缩带,MVIC为26.71±12.88%;骨盆带为35.02±18.28%MVIC)和LM(无骨盆带为30.28±14.60%MVIC;骨盆带为37.47±18.94%MVIC)当应用骨盆加压带时发现(P <0.05)。然而,男性和女性受试者之间的肌电图活性没有显着差异。研究结果表明,骨盆压缩带可通过增加GM和LM并降低QL来防止侧卧髋外展期间不必要的替代运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号