...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sport rehabilitation >Effects of different hip rotations on gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae muscle activity during isometric side-lying hip abduction
【24h】

Effects of different hip rotations on gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae muscle activity during isometric side-lying hip abduction

机译:等距侧卧髋关节外展期间不同髋关节旋转对臀小肌和张筋膜阔肌活动的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Gluteus medius (Gmed) weakness is associated with some lower-extremity injuries. People with Gmed weakness might compensate by activating the tensor fasciae latae (TFL). Different hip rotations in the transverse plane may affect Gmed and TFL muscle activity during isometric side-lying hip abduction (SHA). Objectives: To compare Gmed and TFL muscle activity and the Gmed:TFL muscle-activity ratio during SHA exercise with 3 different hip rotations. Design: The effects of different hip rotations on Gmed, TFL, and the Gmed:TFL muscle-activity ratio during isometric SHA were analyzed with 1-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance. Setting: University research laboratory. Participants: 20 healthy university students were recruited in this study. Interventions: Participants performed isometric SHA: frontal SHA with neutral hip (frontal SHAN), frontal SHA with hip medial rotation (frontal SHA-MR), and frontal SHA with hip lateral rotation (frontal SHA-LR). Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyography measured the activity of the Gmed and the TFL. A 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance assessed the statistical significance of Gmed and TFL muscle activity. When there was a significant difference, a Bonferroni adjustment was performed. Results: Frontal SHA-MR showed significantly greater Gmed muscle activation than frontal SHA-N (P = .000) or frontal SHA-LR (P = .015). Frontal SHA-LR showed significantly greater TFL muscle activation than frontal SHA-N (P = .002). Frontal SHA-MR also resulted in a significantly greater Gmed:TFL muscle-activity ratio than frontal SHA-N (P = .004) or frontal SHA-LR (P = .000), and frontal SHA-N was significantly greater than frontal SHA-LR (P = .000). Conclusions: Frontal SHA-MR results in greater Gmed muscle activation and a higher Gmed:TFL muscle ratio
机译:背景:臀肌(Gmedeus medius,Gmed)虚弱与一些下肢损伤有关。患有Gmed虚弱的人可能会通过激活张量筋膜(TFL)进行补偿。在等距侧卧髋外展(SHA)期间,横向平面中不同的髋关节旋转可能会影响Gmed和TFL肌肉活动。目的:比较3种髋关节旋转SHA运动期间Gmed和TFL肌肉活动以及Gmed:TFL肌肉活动比率。设计:采用单向重复测量方差分析法分析等距SHA期间不同髋关节旋转对Gmed,TFL和Gmed:TFL肌肉活动比的影响。地点:大学研究实验室。参与者:本研究招募了20名健康的大学生。干预措施:参与者进行了等距SHA:额叶SHA与中性髋(额叶SHAN),额叶SHA与髋骨内侧旋转(额叶SHA-MR)和额叶SHA与髋骨外侧旋转(额叶SHA-LR)。主要指标:表面肌电图测量了Gmed和TFL的活性。 1方差的重复测量分析评估了Gmed和TFL肌肉活动的统计学意义。当存在显着差异时,执行Bonferroni调整。结果:额叶SHA-MR的Gmed肌肉活化明显高于额叶SHA-N(P = .000)或额叶SHA-LR(P = .015)。额叶SHA-LR的TFL肌肉活化程度明显高于额叶SHA-N(P = .002)。额叶SHA-MR的Gmed:TFL肌肉活动比也明显高于额叶SHA-N(P = .004)或额叶SHA-LR(P = .000),额叶SHA-N明显大于额叶SHA-N SHA-LR(P = .000)。结论:额叶SHA-MR导致更大的Gmed肌肉激活和更高的Gmed:TFL肌肉比率

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号