首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geoscience Education >Characterizing Teaching in Introductory Geology Courses: Measuring Classroom Practices
【24h】

Characterizing Teaching in Introductory Geology Courses: Measuring Classroom Practices

机译:地质入门课程的特色教学:衡量课堂实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most research about reformed teaching practices in the college science classroom is based on instructor self-report. This research describes what is happening in some introductory geology courses at multiple institutions across the country using external observers. These observations are quantified using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). A scoring rubric created to support consistent application of the 25 items on the RTOP yields very high inter-rater agreement over multiple observations throughout a 3 y period. Using the adapted RTOP instrument, 66 separate observations of introductory physical geology classrooms at 11 different institutions (four associate's colleges, three baccalaureate colleges, a master's university, and three research universities) were collected, and those observations indicate three categories of instruction: (1) teacher-centered, traditional lecture-dominated classrooms (RTOP < 30) with little studènt talk and minimal student activity beyond listening and note taking; (2) transitional classrooms with some activities involving brief student discussions centered around right/wrong answers; and (3) student-centered classrooms (RTOP > 50) with considerable time devoted to active learning and student communications to promote conceptual understanding. The progression from teacher-centered to transitional and then to student-centered categories is incremental across all subscales of the RTOP instrument except for propositional knowledge (character of the lesson's content and instructor's command of the material), which only increases between teacher-centered and transitional categories. This means there is no single path to an active learning, student-centered introductory geology classroom. Such learning environments are achieved with a holistic approach to all aspects of constructivist teaching as measured by RTOP. If the instructor incorporates small changes in multiple aspects of their teaching from disseminator of knowledge to supporter of student learning, then the transition to a student-centered classroom becomes an approachable process. Faculty can also use the RTOP and rubric to guide course planning, promote self-reflection of their teaching, and assist in the peer evaluation of other's teaching.
机译:关于大学科学课堂中改革教学实践的大多数研究都是基于教师的自我报告。这项研究使用外部观察员描述了全国多个机构在一些入门性地质课程中所发生的情况。使用“改革的教学观察协议”(RTOP)对这些观察进行量化。为支持在RTOP上一贯应用25个项目而创建的评分标准,在3年的时间里,多次观察得到的评分者之间的一致性很高。使用调整后的RTOP仪器,收集了11个不同机构(四所专科学院,三所学士学位学院,一所硕士学位大学和三所研究型大学)的物理地理入门课堂的66个单独观察结果,这些观察结果指示了三类教学内容:(1 )以教师为中心的,传统的以演讲为主的教室(RTOP <30),几乎没有学生说话,并且除了听和记笔记以外,学生的活动很少; (2)过渡教室,其中有一些活动涉及围绕正确/错误答案的简短学生讨论; (3)以学生为中心的教室(RTOP> 50),其中大量时间用于主动学习和学生交流,以促进概念理解。从以教师为中心的类别过渡到以学生为中心的类别的进展在RTOP工具的所有子量表中都是递增的,除了命题知识(课程内容的特征和教师对材料的命令的知识)以外,这仅在以教师为中心的知识与教师的命题之间增加过渡类别。这意味着没有一条通向以学生为中心的主动学习型地质课堂的主动途径。这样的学习环境是通过对RTOP衡量的建构主义教学各个方面的整体方法来实现的。如果讲师从知识的传播到学生学习的支持者在教学的各个方面进行了细微的改动,那么过渡到以学生为中心的教室将成为一个容易上手的过程。教师还可以使用RTOP和项目规则来指导课程计划,促进他们对教学的自我反思,并协助对他人教学的同evaluation评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号