...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice >Roles of managers, frontline staff and local champions, in implementing quality improvement: Stakeholders' perspectives
【24h】

Roles of managers, frontline staff and local champions, in implementing quality improvement: Stakeholders' perspectives

机译:经理,一线员工和当地倡导者在实施质量改进中的作用:利益相关者的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Translating promising research findings into routine clinical care has proven difficult to achieve; even highly efficacious programmes remain unadopted. Critical to changing care is an understanding of the context within which the improvement effort occurs, including the climate or culture. Health care systems are multicultural due to the wide variety of professionals, subgroups, divisions and teams within them. Yet, little work describes and compares different stakeholders' views on their and others' roles in promoting successful quality improvement implementation. Objective: To identify manager and frontline staff perspectives about which organizational stakeholders should play a role in implementation efforts as well as what implementation roles these stakeholders should perform. Methods: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews of a purposive sample of stakeholders at the clinic, medical centre and regional network levels. Participants included stakeholders across five clinics (n = 49), their four affiliated medical centres (n = 12) and three regional networks (n = 7). Working in coding teams, we conducted a content analysis utilizing Atlas.ti Version 5. Results: According to informants, individuals at each organizational level have unique and critical roles to play in implementing and sustaining quality improvement efforts. Informants advocated for participation of a wide range of organizational members, described distinct roles for each group, and articulated the need for and defined the characteristics of frontline programme champions. Conclusions: Involvement of multiple types of stakeholders is likely to be costly for health care organizations. Yet, if such organizations are to achieve the highest quality care, it is also likely that such involvement is essential.
机译:背景:已证明难以将有希望的研究成果转化为常规临床护理;甚至高效的程序仍然没有被采用。改变护理的关键是了解改善工作的环境,包括气候或文化。卫生保健系统是多元文化的,这归因于其中的专业人员,小组,部门和团队的多样性。然而,很少有工作描述和比较不同利益相关者对他们和他人在促进成功的质量改进实施中的作用的看法。目标:确定经理和一线员工关于哪些组织利益相关者应在实施工作中发挥作用以及这些利益相关者应发挥什么实施作用的观点。方法:我们在诊所,医疗中心和区域网络级别对有目的的利益相关者样本进行了定性半结构化访谈。参与者包括五个诊所(n = 49),四个附属医疗中心(n = 12)和三个区域网络(n = 7)的利益相关者。在编码团队中,我们使用Atlas.ti版本5进​​行了内容分析。结果:据线人称,每个组织级别的个人在实施和维持质量改进工作中都可以发挥独特而关键的作用。线人倡导广泛的组织成员参与,描述每个小组的不同角色,明确表示对一线计划倡导者的需求和特征。结论:多种类型的利益相关者的参与对于医疗保健组织而言可能是昂贵的。但是,如果这样的组织要获得最高质量的护理,那么这种参与也很可能是必不可少的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号