...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied >Text Skimming: The Process and Effectiveness of Foraging ThroughText Under Time Pressure
【24h】

Text Skimming: The Process and Effectiveness of Foraging ThroughText Under Time Pressure

机译:文本撇取:在时间压力下搜寻文本的过程和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is Skim reading effective? How do readers allocate their attention selectively? The authors report 3experiments that use expository texts and allow readers only enough time to read half of each document.Experiment 1 found that, relative to reading half the text, skimming improved memory for importantideas from a text but did not improve memory of less important details or of inferences made frominformation within the text. Experiment 2 found no advantage of skimming over reading the first orsecond half of every paragraph. Two final experiments using a hierarchical, Website-like layout ofdocuments showed that the advantage of skimming found in Experiment I was dependent on the linkagesbetween pages and, thus, the ease with which participants could navigate through the text. Data onpage-by-page reading times and eye-tracking analyses from Experiment 2 indicated that Skim readersspent more time reading text that was earlier in the paragraph, toward the top of the page and in an earlierpage of the document. These findings were interpreted as evidence in support of a "satisficing" accountof skimming process.
机译:略读有效吗?读者如何有选择地分配注意力?作者报告了3项使用说明性文本的实验,这些实验仅使读者有足够的时间阅读每个文档的一半。实验1发现,相对于阅读一半的文本,从文本中略读了对重要思想的记忆,但并未提高对次要细节的记忆或从文本中的信息得出的推论。实验2发现,与阅读每个段落的前半部分或后半部分相比,略读没有任何优势。使用文档的类似网站的分层布局进行的两个最终实验表明,在实验I中发现的略读的优势取决于页面之间的链接,因此,参与者可以轻松浏览文本。实验2的逐页阅读时间和眼动分析数据表明,略读读者花了更多的时间阅读段落中,页面顶部和文档较早版本中的文本。这些发现被解释为支持“令人满意”的撇取过程的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号