首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Factors influencing the need for target vessel revascularization after renal artery stenting.
【24h】

Factors influencing the need for target vessel revascularization after renal artery stenting.

机译:影响肾动脉支架置入后靶血管血运重建需求的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To provide additional insight into factors that may be associated with the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) following de novo renal artery stenting during long-term follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective chart and database review was conducted to analyze the progress of all patients with de novo symptomatic renal artery stenosis who underwent stent-supported angioplasty under the auspices of the Single Operator, Single Center, Renal Stent Retrospective Study (SOCRATES). The records review identified 782 patients who were enrolled in the study between 1993 and 2004; after excluding 34 (4.5%) patients (lost to follow-up or inadequate data), 748 consecutive patients (412 women; mean age 70.7+/-9.7 years, range 37-92) were suitable for longitudinal analysis. The need for TVR was based on strict clinical criteria (> or =20% rise in serum creatinine, worsening hypertension, and/or recurrent flash pulmonary edema), and all patients underwent multidisciplinary evaluation before stenting andduring follow-up. RESULTS: Follow-up spanned a mean 45.8+/-26.5 months. TVR was needed in 88 (10.03%) of 877 arteries and was best predicted by patient age < or =67 years (OR 2.91, p=0.0001), stent diameter < or =5.0 mm (OR 2.31, p=0.001), solitary functioning kidney (OR 2.01, p=0.048), history of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (OR 1.87, p=0.008), and antecedent history of stroke (OR 1.73, p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Renal artery stenting appears to be durable, with only 10% of stented arteries requiring TVR during clinically-based long-term follow-up. Arteries with a final stent diameter < or =5.0 mm were more than twice as likely to need TVR, as were patients with a solitary kidney. The authors acknowledge that clinical recurrence is not a surrogate for ultrasound surveillance after renal artery stenting, so prospective controlled trials will be needed to determine risk factors for restenosis.
机译:目的:为长期随访期间从头进行肾动脉支架置入后可能需要与靶血管血运重建(TVR)相关的因素提供更多信息。方法:通过回顾性图表和数据库审查,分析了在单操作者,单中心,肾支架回顾性研究(SOCRATES)的主持下,所有接受过支架支持的血管成形术的从头症状性肾动脉狭窄患者的进展。记录审查确定了1993年至2004年之间入组该研究的782例患者。在排除34名(4.5%)患者(失去随访或数据不足)后,连续748名患者(412名女性;平均年龄70.7 +/- 9.7岁,范围37-92)适合进行纵向分析。对TVR的需求是基于严格的临床标准(血清肌酐升高或≥20%,高血压恶化和/或复发性闪光性肺水肿),并且所有患者在置入支架和随访期间均接受了多学科评估。结果:随访时间平均为45.8 +/- 26.5个月。 877条动脉中的88条(10.03%)需要TVR,最好通过患者年龄<或= 67岁(OR 2.91,p = 0.0001),支架直径<或= 5.0 mm(OR 2.31,p = 0.001)来预测肾功能正常(OR 2.01,p = 0.048),下肢周围动脉疾病病史(OR 1.87,p = 0.008)和中风的前期病史(OR 1.73,p = 0.026)。结论:肾动脉支架置入术似乎是持久的,在基于临床的长期随访中只有10%的支架动脉需要TVR。最终支架直径小于或等于5.0毫米的动脉需要TVR的可能性是单肾患者的两倍。作者承认,在肾动脉支架置入术后,临床复发并不是超声监测的替代手段,因此将需要进行前瞻性对照试验以确定再狭窄的危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号