首页> 外文期刊>Clinical toxicology: the official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists >The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception
【24h】

The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception

机译:气味的感知不是化学暴露的替代标志:影响人类气味感知的因素综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context. Clinical toxicologists perform risk assessments and clinical evaluations for patients with potential exposure to airborne toxicants in which the patient's self-reported perception of odor may be the only indicator that an exposure may have taken place. Objective. To review the factors that may affect the human ability to perceive chemical odors and relate those odors to specific chemical exposures. Methods. The medical literature, from 1950 through 2012, was searched using the OVID database and the PUBMED database. The searches returned 238 articles, of which 113 involved human studies and were published in the English language. Of these 113 articles, 40 articles discussed odor issues and thus were chosen as specifically relevant to the topic. Bibliographies of all articles were also searched for other relevant references and this found six additional articles, making a total of 46. Factors that may affect olfaction and the ability to perceive odor Genetic/population. Ethnic background is associated with widely differing odor detection abilities and thresholds. A significant genetic influence for the ability to smell and perceive odor has been reported. Gender. Women are superior to men in their ability to identify odors. Age. Increasing age is correlated with higher odor detection thresholds. Medical conditions. A variety of medical conditions have been associated with deficits in olfaction, including diseases of the nose and sinuses, multiple sclerosis, and schizophrenia. Alcoholism and smoking. Abuse of alcohol results in impaired olfactory sense, and smoking tobacco products alters odor detection threshold in a dose-related manner. Occupational and environmental factors. Repeated inhalation of any chemical results in olfactory fatigue over relatively short time frames that leads to a decreased ability to accurately detect and identify an odor. Recent exposure to relatively high concentrations of a chemical has been shown to affect sensitivity to that particular odorant, altering subsequent detection thresholds by up to three orders of magnitude. Applicability of proposed odor thresholds. Humans are only able to identify three to four components of complex olfactory mixtures and the odorants present in the mixture affect which individual components are detected. Odorants present in suprathreshold concentrations in a mixture may effectively mask the presence of odorants present in perithreshold concentrations. Self-rating of olfactory function may not correlate with actual olfactory ability. It is even more difficult to accurately determine intensity of an odor in a quantifiable way. For example, under conditions of constant stimulation with hydrogen sulfide, perceptual intensity was reported to decrease exponentially with time of stimulation. Concomitant visual stimulation also affects odor intensity. Some chemicals, such as hydrogen sulfide, may induce reactions in humans related solely to their odor, even when they are present in concentrations substantially lower than those levels usually associated with the development of adverse clinical effects. There is a wealth of literature suggesting that the intensity of perceived odor, the degree of irritation, and the reported health effects of exposure to an odorant chemical are affected by psychological state and bias. Multiple theories have been proposed to explain the cognitive basis for perceived illness in association with the perception of odor. The concept of odor has been reported to be intrinsically and cognitively associated with illness rather than with health.
机译:上下文。临床毒物学家对可能暴露于空气中毒物的患者进行风险评估和临床评估,其中患者自我报告的气味知觉可能是暴露发生的唯一指标。目的。审查可能影响人类感知化学气味的能力的因素,并将这些气味与特定的化学暴露联系起来。方法。使用OVID数据库和PUBMED数据库搜索了1950年至2012年的医学文献。搜索返回238篇文章,其中113篇涉及人类研究,并以英语发表。在这113篇文章中,有40篇文章讨论了气味问题,因此被选择为与该主题特别相关。还检索了所有文章的参考书目,以查找其他相关参考文献,从而发现了6篇其他文章,总计46篇。可能影响嗅觉和感知气味的能力的因素遗传/种群。种族背景与气味检测能力和阈值差异很大有关。已经报道了对气味和感知气味的能力的重大遗传影响。性别。女性在识别异味方面的能力优于男性。年龄。年龄的增长与气味检测阈值的升高有关。医疗条件。嗅觉缺陷与多种医学状况有关,包括鼻子和鼻窦疾病,多发性硬化症和精神分裂症。酗酒和吸烟。滥用酒精会导致嗅觉受损,吸烟的烟草制品会以剂量相关的方式改变气味检测阈值。职业和环境因素。重复吸入任何化学物质会在相对较短的时间内导致嗅觉疲劳,从而导致准确检测和识别气味的能力降低。已显示最近暴露于相对较高浓度的化学药品会影响对该特定气味的敏感性,从而将随后的检测阈值改变多达三个数量级。建议气味阈值的适用性。人类只能识别复杂嗅觉混合物的三到四个成分,并且混合物中存在的气味会影响检测到的各个成分。混合物中存在高于阈值浓度的气味可能有效掩盖了高于阈值浓度的气味的存在。嗅觉功能的自我评估可能与实际嗅觉能力不相关。以可量化的方式准确地确定气味的强度甚至更加困难。例如,在用硫化氢不断刺激的条件下,据报道,感知强度随刺激时间呈指数下降。伴随的视觉刺激也会影响气味强度。即使某些化学物质(例如硫化氢)的浓度大大低于通常与不良临床效应相关的水平,也可能在人体内引起仅与它们的气味有关的反应。有大量文献表明,感知到的气味的强度,刺激程度以及所报告的接触气味化学物质对健康的影响均受心理状态和偏见的影响。已经提出了多种理论来解释与气味的感知相关的感知疾病的认知基础。据报道,气味的概念与疾病而非健康具有内在和认知上的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号