...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology >Clinical significance of treatment effects with aripiprazole versus placebo in a study of manic or mixed episodes associated with pediatric bipolar i disorder
【24h】

Clinical significance of treatment effects with aripiprazole versus placebo in a study of manic or mixed episodes associated with pediatric bipolar i disorder

机译:阿立哌唑与安慰剂相比在小儿双相性i躁狂发作或混合发作中的临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Published studies in adult and pediatric bipolar disorder have used different definitions of treatment response. This analysis aimed to compare different definitions of response in a large sample of children and adolescents. Methods: Anexploratory analysis of a 4-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled study assessed patients (n=296; ages, 10-17 years) with an acute manic/mixed episode associated with bipolar I disorder who were randomized to aripiprazole (10 or 30 mg/day) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline to week 4 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score. Additional assessments included: Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Overall and Mania scales, Child Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), and parent and subject General Behavior Inventory. Response was compared across seven operational definitions. Cohen's κ and Spearman's correlation tested relationships between various response definitions or changes in outcome measures and clinically meaningful improvement (defined as a CGI-BP Overall Improvement score of 1 or 2). Results: Response rates varied depending upon the operational definition, but were highest for 95% reliable change (statistical method used to determine individual change from previous assessment) and ≥33% reduction in YMRS total score. Response rate definitions with the highest validity in terms of predicting clinically meaningful improvement were: ≥50% reduction on YMRS (κ=0.64), a composite definition of response (YMRS <12.5, Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) ≤40, and CGAS ≥51; κ=0.59), and 95% reliable change on the CGAS or 33% reduction on YMRS (κ=0.56). Parent ratings of symptoms were generally better at detecting symptom improvement than were subject ratings (κ=~0.4-0.5 vs. ~0.2 when compared with CGI-BP Overall Improvement score). Conclusions: Clinically meaningful definitions of response in acute treatment of a manic/mixed episode in pediatric subjects include a 50% change in YMRS and a composite measure of response. Parent-reported measures of symptom improvement appear reliable for assessing symptom change.
机译:目的:关于成人和儿童双相情感障碍的已发表研究使用了不同的治疗反应定义。该分析旨在比较大量儿童和青少年中对反应的不同定义。方法:一项为期4周,多中心,安慰剂对照研究的探索性分析评估了患有躁郁症/躁郁症伴双相I型障碍的急性发作/混合发作的患者(n = 296;年龄,10-17岁),这些患者被随机分配给阿立哌唑(10例或10例)。 30毫克/天)或安慰剂。主要功效终点是年轻躁狂症评分量表(YMRS)总评分从基线到第4周的平均变化。其他评估包括:临床总体印象-躁郁症(CGI-BP)总体和躁狂量表,儿童总体评估量表(CGAS)以及父母和受试者的一般行为量表。比较了七个运​​营定义的响应。 Cohenκ和Spearman的相关性检验了各种反应定义或结局指标变化与临床意义改善之间的关系(定义为CGI-BP总体改善评分为1或2)。结果:响应率因操作定义而异,但对于95%的可靠更改(用于根据先前评估确定个人更改的统计方法)和YMRS总得分降低≥33%最高。就预测临床意义上的改善而言,具有最高有效性的缓解率定义为:≥50%的YMRS降低(κ= 0.64),响应的综合定义(YMRS <12.5,儿童抑郁量表修订版(CDRS-R)≤ 40,而CGAS≥51;κ= 0.59),CGAS的可靠变化为95%,YMRS降低了33%(κ= 0.56)。父母对症状的评级通常比受试者的评级更好(K =〜0.4-0.5 vs.〜0.2,与CGI-BP总体改善得分相比)。结论:急性治疗躁狂/混合发作的儿科受试者中,临床上有意义的反应定义包括:YMRS发生50%的变化和反应的综合量度。父母报告的症状改善措施似乎可用于评估症状变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号