...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Allogeneic blood transfusions and postoperative infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty
【24h】

Allogeneic blood transfusions and postoperative infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty

机译:全髋或膝关节置换术后异体输血和术后感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Up to 70% of patients who undergo total hip or total knee arthroplasty receive blood transfusions. Using data from more than 12,000 patients assessed in the Phase-III RECORD (Regulation of Coagulation in Orthopedic Surgery to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism) studies, we investigated whether allogeneic blood transfusion increases the risk of postoperative infection compared with autologous blood transfusion or no transfusion. Methods: A post hoc analysis of the pooled RECORD data stratified patients into three groups according to the type of blood transfusion that they received: no transfusion (n = 6313), autologous blood transfusion (n = 1902), and allogeneic blood transfusion with or without autologous blood transfusion (n = 3962). The types of postoperative infection were recorded and included lower or upper respiratory tract and lung infection, bone and joint infection, wound inflammation or infection, urinary tract infection, and other infections. Results: The rates of infection in patients receiving no transfusion or autologous blood transfusion were similar; therefore, data from these two groups were combined. The rate of any infection was 9.9% (392 of 3962) in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion and 7.9% (646 of 8215) in patients not receiving allogeneic blood transfusion with or without autologous blood transfusion (p = 0.003). The rates of lower or upper respiratory tract and lung infection (2.1% [eighty-five of 3962] versus 1.3% [109 of 8215]; p = 0.002) and of wound inflammation or infection (2.4% [ninety-four of 3962] versus 1.7% [138 of 8215]; p = 0.046) were significantly higher in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with patients not receiving allogeneic blood transfusion. When comparing patients who had received allogeneic blood transfusion with those who had not received allogeneic blood transfusion, the rates of bone and joint infection (0.4% [fourteen of 3962] versus 0.2% [eighteen of 8215]; p = 0.056), of urinary tract infection (3.1% [123 of 3962] versus 2.5% [209 of 8215]; p = 0.551), and of other infections (3.0% [120 of 3962] versus 2.7% [225 of 8215]; p = 0.308) were not significantly different. Conclusions: The rates of any infection, lower or upper respiratory tract and lung infection, and wound inflammation or infection were significantly increased after elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with those receiving autologous blood transfusion or no blood transfusion.
机译:背景:进行全髋或全膝关节置换术的患者中,多达70%接受输血。使用III期RECORD(骨科手术中的凝血调节以防止深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞)研究中评估的12,000多名患者的数据,我们调查了同种异体输血是否比自体输血或是否增加了术后感染的风险没有输血。方法:对收集到的RECORD数据进行事后分析,根据患者接受的输血类型将其分为三组:不输血(n = 6313),自体输血(n = 1902)以及同种异体输血没有自体输血(n = 3962)。记录术后感染的类型,包括下或上呼吸道和肺部感染,骨骼和关节感染,伤口发炎或感染,尿路感染和其他感染。结果:未接受输血或自体输血的患者的感染率相似;因此,将这两组的数据合并在一起。接受同种异体输血的患者中,任何感染的发生率为9.9%(3962中的392),未接受或不进行自体输血的异体血液患者中的任何感染率​​为7.9%(8215中的646)(p = 0.003)。下呼吸道或上呼吸道和肺部感染的发生率(2.1%[3962,八分之五]对1.3%[8215的109]; p = 0.002)和伤口发炎或感染的发生率(2.4%[3962,四分之九])与未接受异体输血的患者相比,接受异体输血的患者的比例为1.7%[82 of 138中的138]; p = 0.046)。在比较接受异体输血的患者和未接受异体输血的患者时,骨和关节感染的发生率(0.4%[3962的十四]与0.2%[8215的十八]; p = 0.056)道感染(3.1%[3962的123]对2.5%[20915的209]; p = 0.551)和其他感染(3.0%[3962的120]对2.7%[8215的225]; p = 0.308)没有明显的不同。结论:与自体输血或不输血相比,同种异体输血患者在全髋或全膝关节置换术中,任何感染,下呼吸道或上呼吸道和肺部感染以及伤口炎症或感染的发生率均显着增加。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号