首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging and physical activity >Traditional versus functional strength training: Effects on muscle strength and power in the elderly
【24h】

Traditional versus functional strength training: Effects on muscle strength and power in the elderly

机译:传统与功能力量训练:对老年人肌肉力量和力量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim was to determine whether strength training with machines vs. functional strength training at 80% of one-repetition maximum improves muscle strength and power among the elderly. Sixty-three subjects (69.9 ± 4.1 yr) were randomized to a high-power strength group (HPSG), a functional strength group (FSG), or a nonrandomized control group (CG). Data were collected using a force platform and linear encoder. The training dose was 2 times/wk, 3 sets × 8 reps, for 11 wk. There were no differences in effect between HPSG and FSG concerning sit-to-stand power, box-lift power, and bench-press maximum force. Leg-press maximum force improved in HPSG (19.8%) and FSG (19.7%) compared with CG (4.3%; p = .026). Bench-press power improved in HPSG (25.1%) compared with FSG (0.5%, p = .02) and CG (2%, p = .04). Except for bench-press power there were no differences in the effect of the training interventions on functional power and maximal body strength.
机译:目的是确定在一次重复最大锻炼次数的80%时,使用机器进行力量训练与进行功能性力量训练是否能改善老年人的肌肉力量和力量。六十三名受试者(69.9±4.1年)被随机分为高功率强度组(HPSG),功能强度组(FSG)或非随机对照组(CG)。使用力平台和线性编码器收集数据。训练剂量为2次/周,3组×8次,共11周。 HPSG和FSG在坐姿到站姿,举重能力和卧推最大力量方面没有影响。与CG(4.3%; p = .026)相比,HPSG(19.8%)和FSG(19.7%)的腿部按压最大力量有所改善。与FSG(0.5%,p = .02)和CG(2%,p = .04)相比,HPSG(25.1%)的卧推力量得到了改善。除了卧推力量,训练干预对功能力量和最大身体力量的影响没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号