...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of AOAC International >Comparison of analytical methods to determine sodium content of low-sodium foods.
【24h】

Comparison of analytical methods to determine sodium content of low-sodium foods.

机译:测定低钠食品中钠含量的分析方法比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

U.S. nutrition labeling regulations require the declaration of sodium content on food products. Accurate and reproducible determination of Na in foods with low Na content (< 140 mg/serving) is challenging because of laboratory contamination. Within-laboratory performance of inductively coupled plasma/MS (ICP/MS), flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS), ion-selective electrode (ISE), and potentiometric titration of chloride ion were evaluated in 17 low-sodium foods. For 13 types of food, statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) exist between the within-day andlor interday means obtained by ICP/MS, FAAS, and ISE. Median within-day and interday precent RSD values were 2.7 and 6.1, 3.5 and 3.2, and 5.6 and 6.2%, respectively, by ICP/MS, FAAS, and ISE. The fewest matrix effects were found with ICP/MS, followed by FAAS, and ISE. FAAS gave higher results in a variety of matrixes when compared to ICP/MS and/or ISE. ISE did not perform well in fatty foods or at very low Na concentrations. Manufacturers' Nutrition Facts Panel sodium declarations exceeded levels found by analysis in > 70% of the foods. Analysis of chloride content does not produce reliable Na estimates in low-sodium foods, even when added sodium chloride is present. Methodological issues and contamination sources are discussed.
机译:美国营养标签法规要求声明食品中的钠含量。由于实验室污染,准确和可重复测定低钠含量(<140毫克/份)食品中的钠具有挑战性。在17种低钠食品中评估了电感耦合等离子体/ MS(ICP / MS),火焰原子吸收分光光度法(FAAS),离子选择电极(ISE)和氯离子电位滴定法在实验室内的性能。对于13种食物,通过ICP / MS,FAAS和ISE获得的日内和/或日间平均值之间存在统计上的显着差异(P <0.05)。 ICP / MS,FAAS和ISE的日中和日间百分之百RSD值分别为2.7%和6.1%,3.5%和3.2%,5.6%和6.2%。 ICP / MS发现的基质效应最少,其次是FAAS和ISE。与ICP / MS和/或ISE相比,FAAS在各种矩阵中给出了更高的结果。 ISE在高脂食品或低钠浓度下的效果不佳。制造商的营养成分面板中的钠申报量超过了70%的食品中分析得出的水平。即使存在添加的氯化钠,对低钠食品中的氯化物含量进行分析也无法得出可靠的Na估算值。讨论了方法学问题和污染源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号