首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of Raman LIDAR signal estimation and smoothing methods and correlation between the Pierre Auger side scattering method for determining aerosol content in the troposphere.
【24h】

A comparison of Raman LIDAR signal estimation and smoothing methods and correlation between the Pierre Auger side scattering method for determining aerosol content in the troposphere.

机译:拉曼LIDAR信号估计和平滑方法的比较以及Pierre Auger侧向散射方法用于确定对流层气溶胶含量的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Raman backscatter LIDAR is the standard method in atmospheric physics for measuring atmospheric aerosol optical depth profiles. Cosmic ray observatories, including HiRes and Pierre Auger, measure the aerosol optical depth using an elastic side scattering technique. A first ever comparison between the two methods was carried out in southeastern Colorado at the Pierre Auger R&D site. Between September 2010 and June 2011, over 300 hours of data was collected by the side scattering and Raman LIDAR system in parallel and over 900 hours of data was collected by the LIDAR alone.;LIDAR backscattering signals become increasingly dominated by noise as height increases due to an ever decreasing photon return. Smoothing of the signals is required to obtain a usable aerosol optical depth profile. Free-degree density estimation and a customized kernel density estimation smoothing technique were applied to the Raman LIDAR data. It was found that both the free-degree density estimation and the kernel density estimation smoothing techniques work well for LIDAR signals. A strong linear correlation coefficient above 0.9 was calculated between the two techniques. These smoothing techniques were compared with the Savitzky-Golay smoothing technique currently used by a Raman LIDAR group in L'Aquila, Italy. Although the correlations between the density estimation techniques and Savitzky-Golay technique were still strong (above 0.8), there is a systematic difference in the aerosol optical depths observed of around 0.02. Since the two density smoothing techniques smooth the LIDAR signals well, this shift might be explained by differences in the two analyses. A similar systematic offset is seen when comparing the density smoothing methods to the side scattering data.
机译:拉曼背向散射激光雷达是大气物理学中用于测量大气气溶胶光学深度剖面的标准方法。包括HiRes和Pierre Auger在内的宇宙射线天文台使用弹性侧向散射技术测量气溶胶的光学深度。两种方法之间的首次比较是在科罗拉多州东南部的Pierre Auger研发中心进行的。在2010年9月至2011年6月之间,侧面散射和拉曼LIDAR系统并行收集了300多个小时的数据,仅LIDAR收集了900多个小时的数据。随着高度的增加,LIDAR的后向散射信号越来越受到噪声的支配。到不断下降的光子返回。为了获得可用的气溶胶光学深度轮廓,需要对信号进行平滑处理。自由度密度估计和定制的内核密度估计平滑技术应用于拉曼激光雷达数据。已经发现,自由度密度估计和核密度估计平滑技术对于LIDAR信号均适用。两种技术之间均计算出高于0.9的强线性相关系数。将这些平滑技术与意大利拉奎拉(La'Aquila)的拉曼LIDAR集团目前使用的Savitzky-Golay平滑技术进行了比较。尽管密度估算技术和Savitzky-Golay技术之间的相关性仍然很强(高于0.8),但是观察到的气溶胶光学深度存在系统差异,约为0.02。由于两种密度平滑技术可以很好地平滑LIDAR信号,因此可以通过两种分析方法的差异来解释这种偏移。将密度平滑方法与侧面散射数据进行比较时,可以看到类似的系统偏移。

著录项

  • 作者

    Coco, Michael B.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado School of Mines.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado School of Mines.;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.;Atmospheric Sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 116 p.
  • 总页数 116
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号