首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry >Heat-induced gelation of pea legumin: comparison with soybean glycinin.
【24h】

Heat-induced gelation of pea legumin: comparison with soybean glycinin.

机译:豌豆豆蛋白的热诱导胶凝:与大豆大豆球蛋白的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Gel network formation of pea legumin (8.4% on a protein basis, pH 7.6) was monitored via dynamic rheological measurements. Gelation was performed in the absence and presence of the thiol-blocking reagent N-ethylmaleimide, at different rates of heating and cooling. Overall, it was shown that pea legumin gel formation was not effected by changes in the heating rate, and the two differently heated samples were unaffected by the addition of 20 mM NEM, which indicated that disulfide bonds were not essential within the network strands of these legumin gels. However, slowly cooling the legumin samples caused disulfide bonds to become involved within the network; this was observed by a large increase in gel strength that was then substantially reduced when repeating the sample in the presence of NEM. These experiments were repeated with soybean glycinin in order to determine whether a common model for gel formation of legumin-like proteins could be built, based upon molecular reasoning. The two proteins were affected in the same way by changes in the conditions used, but when applying a procedure of reheating and recooling the gel networks responded differently. Pea legumin gel networks were susceptible to rearrangements that caused the gels to become stronger after reheating/recooling, yet glycinin gel networks were not. It was concluded that the same physical and chemical forces drove the processes of denaturation, aggregation, and network formation. Each process can therefore be readily targeted for modification based upon molecular reasoning. Pea legumin and soybean glycinin gel networks had structurally different building blocks, however. A model of gelation aimed at texture control therefore requires additional information.
机译:通过动态流变学测量来监测豌豆豆蛋白的凝胶网络形成(基于蛋白质的8.4%,pH 7.6)。在不存在和存在硫醇封闭剂N-乙基马来酰亚胺的情况下,以不同的加热和冷却速率进行胶凝。总体而言,表明豌豆豆蛋白凝胶的形成不受加热速率变化的影响,并且两个不同加热的样品不受添加20 mM NEM的影响,这表明二硫键在它们的网络链中不是必需的豆蛋白凝胶。但是,缓慢冷却豆类样品会使二硫键进入网络。通过凝胶强度的大幅度增加可以观察到这一点,然后在存在NEM的情况下重复样品时,凝胶强度就会大大降低。大豆大豆球蛋白重复了这些实验,以便基于分子推理确定是否可以建立一种豆科动物类蛋白凝胶形成的通用模型。所用条件的变化会以相同的方式影响这两种蛋白质,但是当应用重新加热和重新冷却的程序时,凝胶网络的响应会有所不同。豌豆豆蛋白凝胶网络易受重排的影响,从而导致凝胶在重新加热/冷却后变得更坚固,而大豆球蛋白凝胶网络则不然。结论是,相同的物理和化学作用力推动了变性,聚集和网络形成过程。因此,可以基于分子推理轻松地将每个过程作为修饰的目标。但是,豌豆豆蛋白和大豆大豆球蛋白凝胶网络在结构上却有不同的组成部分。因此,针对纹理控制的凝胶化模型需要其他信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号