...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Constructions of spirituality in contemporary nursing theory.
【24h】

Constructions of spirituality in contemporary nursing theory.

机译:当代护理理论中的灵性建构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The nursing literature on spirituality tends to agree that modern science is relatively powerless to address the loss of personal meaning experienced by people facing death, suffering and loss. As a remedy, the literature recommends addressing patients' spirituality. The typical analytical move is to distinguish spirituality from religion and consider it a part, dimension or property of the patient. AIM AND METHOD: This paper uses discourse analysis to identify the formal properties of scientific and religious discourses and their social and political implications. The nursing literature is then investigated to detect the use of such discourses in constructing the object spirituality and to consider any implications for nursing as a social practice. FINDINGS: Far from escaping science and religion, the literature constructs spirituality by means of scientific and religious discourses. These discourses have characteristic strengths and weaknesses that the nursing literature seems to miss. Accordingly, its use of religious discourse lacks coherence and depth, and risks merging human with transcendent authority. Its use of scientific discourse lacks precision and clarity and risks intensifying those features of modernity which contribute to a loss of personal meaning in the face of death, suffering and loss. CONCLUSION: Nursing literature on spirituality raises important questions but is limited in its capacity to address them. This paper provides an alternative perspective. First, it draws on an analysis of the modern institutional environment and its existential dimension. Secondly, it applies discourse analysis to the task of helping people experiencing illness and injury. This approach respects the strengths and limitations of both scientific and religious discourses.
机译:背景:关于灵性的护理文献倾向于同意,现代科学相对无能为力,无法解决面临死亡,痛苦和损失的人们所经历的个人意义的丧失。作为补救措施,文献建议解决患者的灵性问题。典型的分析方法是将灵性与宗教区分开,并将其视为患者的组成部分,维度或性质。目的和方法:本文使用话语分析来确定科学和宗教话语的形式特征及其社会和政治含义。然后,对护理文献进行调查,以发现此类话语在建构客体灵性方面的用途,并考虑对护理作为一种社会实践的意义。结果:文学并没有逃脱科学和宗教的束缚,而是通过科学和宗教的话语建构了灵性。这些论述具有护理文献似乎忽略的独特优势和劣势。因此,它对宗教话语的使用缺乏连贯性和深度,并有使人与超越权威融合的风险。它对科学话语的使用缺乏精确性和清晰度,并且有可能加剧现代性的特征,这些特征在面对死亡,痛苦和损失时会导致丧失个人意义。结论:关于灵性的护理文献提出了重要的问题,但解决这些问题的能力有限。本文提供了另一种观点。首先,它对现代制度环境及其存在维度进行了分析。其次,它将话语分析应用于帮助人们患病和受伤的任务。这种方法尊重科学和宗教话语的优点和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号