首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study.
【24h】

Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study.

机译:结构化的血糖自我监测可显着降低控制不良,未经胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病的A1C水平:结构化测试计划研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of structured blood glucose testing in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 12-month, prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter study recruited 483 poorly controlled (A1C >/= 7.5%), insulin-naive type 2 diabetic subjects from 34 primary care practices in the U.S. Practices were randomized to an active control group (ACG) with enhanced usual care or a structured testing group (STG) with enhanced usual care and at least quarterly use of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). STG patients and physicians were trained to use a paper tool to collect/interpret 7-point glucose profiles over 3 consecutive days. The primary end point was A1C level measured at 12 months. RESULTS: The 12-month intent-to-treat analysis (ACG, n = 227; STG, n = 256) showed significantly greater reductions in mean (SE) A1C in the STG compared with the ACG: -1.2% (0.09) vs. -0.9% (0.10); Delta = -0.3%; P = 0.04. Per protocol analysis (ACG, n = 161; STG, n = 130) showed even greater mean (SE) A1C reductions in the STG compared with the ACG: -1.3% (0.11) vs. -0.8% (0.11); Delta = -0.5%; P < 0.003. Significantly more STG patients received a treatment change recommendation at the month 1 visit compared with ACG patients, regardless of the patient's initial baseline A1C level: 179 (75.5%) vs. 61 (28.0%); <0.0001. Both STG and ACG patients displayed significant (P < 0.0001) improvements in general well-being (GWB). CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate use of structured SMBG significantly improves glycemic control and facilitates more timely/aggressive treatment changes in noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes without decreasing GWB.
机译:目的:评估结构化血糖测试在控制不佳,非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病中的有效性。研究设计和方法:这项为期12个月的前瞻性,整群随机,多中心研究从美国34个初级护理实践中招募了483名控制不佳(A1C> / = 7.5%),未经胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病受试者。具有增强常规护理水平的活动对照组(ACG)或具有增强常规护理水平且至少每季度使用一次结构化血糖自我监测(SMBG)的结构化测试组(STG)。对STG患者和医生进行了培训,使其能够使用纸质工具连续3天收集/解释7点血糖分布。主要终点是12个月时测得的A1C水平。结果:12个月的意向性治疗分析(ACG,n = 227; STG,n = 256)显示,与ACG相比,STG中的平均(SE)A1C降低幅度更大:-1.2%(0.09)vs 。-0.9%(0.10);增量= -0.3%; P = 0.04。根据协议分析(ACG,n = 161; STG,n = 130)显示,与ACG相比,STG的平均(SE)A1C降低幅度更大:-1.3%(0.11)对-0.8%(0.11);增量= -0.5%; P <0.003。与ACG患者相比,与ACG患者相比,在第1个月就诊的STG患者明显多于治疗变更建议,无论患者的初始基线A1C水平如何:179(75.5%)对61(28.0%); <0.0001。 STG和ACG患者的总体健康状况(GWB)均显着改善(P <0.0001)。结论:适当使用结构化SMBG可以显着改善血糖控制,并促进非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病更及时/积极的治疗改变,而不会降低GWB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号