首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Insulin degludec improves health-related quality of life (SF-36?) compared with insulin glargine in people with Type 2 diabetes starting on basal insulin: A meta-analysis of phase 3a trials
【24h】

Insulin degludec improves health-related quality of life (SF-36?) compared with insulin glargine in people with Type 2 diabetes starting on basal insulin: A meta-analysis of phase 3a trials

机译:与甘精胰岛素相比,地格胰岛素能改善与健康相关的生活质量(SF-36?),从基础胰岛素开始的2型糖尿病患者:3a期临床试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To compare the effect of insulin degludec and insulin glargine on health-related quality of life in patients with Type 2 diabetes starting on insulin therapy. Methods: Patient-level data from three open-label, randomized, treat-to-target trials of 26 or 52 weeks' duration were pooled using a weighted analysis in conjunction with a fixed-effects model. Insulin-naive patients received either insulin degludec (n = 1290) or insulin glargine (n = 632) once daily, in combination with oral anti-diabetic drugs. Glycaemic control was assessed via HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. Rates of hypoglycaemia, defined as plasma glucose 3.1 mmol/l ( 56 mg/dl), were recorded. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the 36-item Short Form (SF-36?) version 2 questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear model with treatment, trial, anti-diabetic therapy at baseline, gender, region and age as explanatory variables. Results: Insulin degludec was confirmed as non-inferior to insulin glargine based on HbA1c concentrations. In each trial comprising the meta-analysis, fasting plasma glucose and confirmed overall and nocturnal (00.01-05.59 h) hypoglycaemia were all numerically or significantly lower with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine. At endpoint, the overall physical health component score was significantly higher (better) with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine [+0.66 (95% CI 0.04-1.28)], largely attributable to a difference [+1.10 (95% CI 0.22-1.98)] in the bodily pain domain score. In the mental domains, vitality was significantly higher with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine [+0.81 (95% CI 0.01-1.59)]. Conclusions: Compared with insulin glargine, insulin degludec leads to improvements in both mental and physical health status for patients with Type 2 diabetes initiating insulin therapy.
机译:目的:比较从胰岛素治疗开始,地高地胰岛素和甘精胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量的影响。方法:采用加权分析与固定效应模型相结合的方法,收集了三项为期26或52周的开放标签,随机,按目标治疗的试验的患者水平数据。初治胰岛素的患者每天口服一次地格曲胰岛素(n = 1290)或甘精胰岛素(n = 632),并联合口服抗糖尿病药物。通过HbA1c和空腹血糖浓度评估血糖控制。记录了定义为血浆葡萄糖<3.1 mmol / l(<56 mg / dl)的低血糖发生率。使用36项简短表格(SF-36?)第2版问卷评估了与健康相关的生活质量。使用广义线性模型进行统计学分析,以基线时的治疗,试验,抗糖尿病治疗,性别,区域和年龄为解释变量。结果:基于HbA1c浓度,地格胰岛素被认为不逊于甘精胰岛素。在每项包括荟萃分析的试验中,与地甘精胰岛素相比,胰岛素地格曲克的空腹血糖水平和确诊的总体和夜间(00.01-05.59 h)低血糖均在数值上或显着降低。在终点,胰岛素地屈曲与甘精胰岛素的整体身体健康成分评分明显更高(更好)[+ 0.66(95%CI 0.04-1.28)],这在很大程度上归因于差异[+1.10(95%CI 0.22-1.98) )]在身体疼痛区域得分。在精神方面,地格胰岛素与甘精胰岛素相比活力显着更高[+0.81(95%CI 0.01-1.59)]。结论:与甘精胰岛素相比,地高铁胰岛素可改善2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗的心理和身体健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号