...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Assessing student understanding of physical hydrology
【24h】

Assessing student understanding of physical hydrology

机译:评估学生对物理水文学的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Our objective is to devise a mechanism to characterize and assess upper division and graduate student thinking in hydrology. We accomplish this through development and testing of an assessment tool for a physical hydrology class. The instrument was piloted in two sections of a physical hydrology course. Students were asked to respond to two questions that probed understanding and one question that assessed their ability to apply their knowledge, both prior to and after the course. Student and expert responses to the questions were classified into broad categories to develop a rubric to score responses. Using the rubric, three researchers independently blind-coded the full set of pre- and post-artifacts, resulting in 89% inter-rater agreement on the pre-tests and 83% agreement on the post-tests. The majority of responses made by students at the beginning of the class were characterized as showing only recognition of hydrology concepts from a non-physical perspective; post surveys indicated that the majority had moved to a basic understanding of physical processes, with some students achieving expert understanding. Our study has limitations, including the small number of participants who were all from one institution and the fact that the rubric was still under development. Nevertheless, the high inter-rater agreement from a group of experts indicates that the process we undertook is potentially useful for assessment of learning and understanding physical hydrology.
机译:我们的目标是设计一种机制,以表征和评估水文学的上层部门和研究生的思想。我们通过开发和测试物理水文学课程的评估工具来实现这一目标。该仪器在物理水文学课程的两个部分中进行了试验。在课程开始之前和之后,要求学生回答两个探究理解能力的问题和一个评估他们运用知识的能力的问题。学生和专家对问题的回答被分为几大类,以制定专栏来对回答进行评分。三名研究人员使用该规则,对整个伪像前和伪像进行了独立的盲处理,从而使评估者对预测试达成了89%的共识,对评估后达成了83%的共识。在课程开始时,学生做出的大多数回答的特征是仅从非物理的角度显示了对水文学概念的认可。事后调查表明,大多数人已经对物理过程有了基本的了解,有些学生已经达到了专家的理解。我们的研究存在局限性,其中包括来自一所机构的少数参与者,以及该规则仍在开发中的事实。但是,专家组之间的高度评价者一致认为,我们进行的过程可能对评估学习和理解物理水文学的工作很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号