...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of gastroenterology : >Laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension.
【24h】

Laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension.

机译:腹腔镜和开腹脾切除术和门静脉高压合术治疗门静脉高压症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal devascularization for portal hypertension. METHODS: From June 2006 to March 2009, laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) were performed on 28 patients with cirrhosis, bleeding due to portal hypertension, and secondary hypersplenism. Success was achieved in 26 patients. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables of the patients were compared. RESULTS: Success of laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection was achieved in all but two patients (7.14%) who required open splenectomy and azygoportal devascularization (OSD). The operation time was significantly longer in patients undergoing LSD than in those undergoing OSD (235 +/- 36 min vs 178 +/- 47 min, P < 0.05). The estimated intraoperative blood loss was much more in patients receiving OSD than in those receiving LSD (420 +/- 50 mL vs 200 +/- 30 mL, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection who received transfusion of packed red blood cells during or after the operation was 23.08% and 38.46%, respectively (P < 0.05). The time of first oral intake was faster in patients after LSD than in those after OSD (1.5 +/- 0.7 d vs 3.5 +/- 1.6 d, P < 0.05). The hospital stay of patients after LSD was shorter than that of patients after OSD (6.5 +/- 2.3 d vs 11.7 +/- 4.5 d, P < 0.05). The pain requiring medication was less severe in patients after LSD than in those after OSD (7.69% vs 73.08%, P < 0.001). The overall complication rate was lower in patients after LSD than in those after OSD (19.23% vs 42.31%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection are the feasible, effective, and safe surgical procedure, and are advantageous over minimally invasive surgery for bleeding portal hypertension and hypersplenism.
机译:目的:比较腹腔镜和开腹脾切除术和门静脉高压通气治疗门静脉高压症的结果。方法:2006年6月至2009年3月,对28例肝硬化,门静脉高压性出血和继发性脾功能亢进的患者进行腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉断流术(LSD)。 26名患者获得了成功。比较了患者的人口统计学,术中和术后变量。结果:除2例(7.14%)需要行脾切除术和无门静脉血运重建术(OSD)的患者外,其他所有患者均成功完成了腹腔镜脾切除术和无门静脉切开术。与接受OSD的患者相比,接受LSD的患者的手术时间明显更长(235 +/- 36分钟与178 +/- 47分钟,P <0.05)。与接受LSD的患者相比,接受OSD的患者估计的术中出血量要多得多(420 +/- 50 mL对200 +/- 30 mL,P <0.01)。术中或术后接受腹腔镜,开放性脾切除术和门静脉全切术输血的患者比例分别为23.08%和38.46%(P <0.05)。 LSD后患者的首次口服时间比OSD后患者更快(1.5 +/- 0.7 d和3.5 +/- 1.6 d,P <0.05)。 LSD后患者的住院时间比OSD后患者的住院时间短(6.5 +/- 2.3 d和11.7 +/- 4.5 d,P <0.05)。 LSD术后患者的需药痛苦不如OSD术后严重(7.69%vs 73.08%,P <0.001)。 LSD后患者的总并发症发生率低于OSD患者(19.23%对42.31%,P <0.05)。结论:腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术是可行,有效和安全的手术方法,并且比微创手术更能有效治疗门脉高压症和脾功能亢进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号