首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension
【24h】

Modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension

机译:改良型腹腔镜和开腹脾切除术及门静脉高压脱位术治疗门脉高压症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection has been reported safe, feasible and minimally invasive for patients with portal hypertension. We have developed an even less invasive technique, modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection, and compared outcomes of modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection in patients with portal hypertension. Methods We retrospectively evaluated outcomes in 107 cirrhotic patients with portal hypertensive bleeding and secondary hypersplenism who underwent modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (n = 37) or open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (n = 70) between January 2010 and February 2013. Their demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared. Results Modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection was successful in all patients, with none requiring conversion to open surgery or having significant perioperative complications. Operation time was significantly longer for modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection than open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (p < 0.0001), but estimated intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.0004); volume of intraoperative blood transfusion (p < 0.05); visual analog scale pain score on the first postoperative day (P < 0.0001); times to first oral intake (p < 0.0001), passage of flatus (P = 0.0004), and off-bed activity (p < 0.0001); postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.0001); postoperative days of temperature >38.0 °C (P = 0.002); white blood cell counts on postoperative days 1 (p < 0.0001) and 7 (p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group. The percentage of patients experiencing postoperative complications was significantly lower in the modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group than in the open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group (13.5 % [5/37] vs. 35.7 % [25/70], p < 0.05). Conclusions The less invasive modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection group is a feasible, effective, and safe surgical procedure for liver cirrhosis patients with portal hypertensive bleeding and hypersplenism.
机译:背景技术据报道,腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术对于门静脉高压症患者是安全,可行和微创的。我们已经开发了一种侵入性更小的技术,改良的腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术,并比较了门静脉高压症患者改良的腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术以及开放性脾切除术和缝合门动脉断开术的结果。方法我们回顾性评估了2010年1月至2013年2月间接受改良腹腔镜脾切除加无胆门断开(n = 37)或开腹脾切除及无胆门连接(n = 70)的门静脉高压性出血和继发性脾功能亢进的107例肝硬化患者的结局。比较术中和术后变量。结果改良腹腔镜脾切除术和无门静脉切断术在所有患者中均成功,无一例需要转为开放手术或有明显的围手术期并发症。改良腹腔镜脾切除术和无门静脉切断术的手术时间明显比开放脾切除术和无门静脉门切断术的时间长(p <0.0001),但估计术中失血量(P = 0.0004);术中输血量(p <0.05);术后第一天的视觉模拟疼痛评分(P <0.0001);首次口服的次数(p <0.0001),肠胃气通过(P = 0.0004)和下床活动(p <0.0001);术后住院时间(p <0.0001);术后温度> 38.0°C(P = 0.002);改良的腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术组在术后第1天(p <0.0001)和第7天(p <0.05)的白细胞计数显着降低。改良的腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术组的术后并发症发生率显着低于开放脾切除术和门静脉切断术组(13.5%[5/37] vs. 35.7%[25/70],p <0.05) 。结论侵入性较小的改良型腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉切断术组是门静脉高压性出血和脾功能亢进的肝硬化患者的一种可行,有效和安全的手术方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号