首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension
【2h】

Laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension

机译:腹腔镜和开放式脾切除术及门静脉高压断开治疗门脉高压症

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal devascularization for portal hypertension.METHODS: From June 2006 to March 2009, laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) were performed on 28 patients with cirrhosis, bleeding due to portal hypertension, and secondary hypersplenism. Success was achieved in 26 patients. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables of the patients were compared.RESULTS: Success of laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection was achieved in all but two patients (7.14%) who required open splenectomy and azygoportal devascularization (OSD). The operation time was significantly longer in patients undergoing LSD than in those undergoing OSD (235 ± 36 min vs 178 ± 47 min, P < 0.05). The estimated intraoperative blood loss was much more in patients receiving OSD than in those receiving LSD (420 ± 50 mL vs 200 ± 30 mL, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection who received transfusion of packed red blood cells during or after the operation was 23.08% and 38.46%, respectively (P < 0.05). The time of first oral intake was faster in patients after LSD than in those after OSD (1.5 ± 0.7 d vs 3.5 ± 1.6 d, P < 0.05). The hospital stay of patients after LSD was shorter than that of patients after OSD (6.5 ± 2.3 d vs 11.7 ± 4.5 d, P < 0.05). The pain requiring medication was less severe in patients after LSD than in those after OSD (7.69% vs 73.08%, P < 0.001). The overall complication rate was lower in patients after LSD than in those after OSD (19.23% vs 42.31%, P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection are the feasible, effective, and safe surgical procedure, and are advantageous over minimally invasive surgery for bleeding portal hypertension and hypersplenism.
机译:目的:比较腹腔镜和开腹脾切除术及门静脉高压支气管切开术的结局。方法:自2006年6月至2009年3月,对28例肝硬化,门静脉高压性出血和肝硬化患者行腹腔镜脾切除术和门静脉断流术(LSD)。继发性脾功能亢进。 26名患者获得了成功。结果:腹腔镜脾切除术和无胆门切开术的成功率仅次于两名患者(7.14%),这些患者均需进行开放性脾切除术和无门静脉切开术(OSD)。与接受OSD的患者相比,接受LSD的患者的手术时间明显更长(235±36分钟vs 178±47分钟,P <0.05)。接受OSD的患者术中估计失血量比接受LSD的患者术中失血量高得多(420±50 mL对200±30 mL,P <0.01)。术中或术后接受腹腔镜,开腹脾切除术和漏诊合并门静脉切开术的患者比例分别为23.08%和38.46%(P <0.05)。 LSD后患者的首次口服时间比OSD后患者更快(1.5±0.7 d vs 3.5±1.6 d,P <0.05)。 LSD后患者的住院时间比OSD后患者的住院时间短(6.5±2.3 d vs 11.7±4.5 d,P <0.05)。 LSD后患者比OSD后患者需要药物治疗的痛苦程度轻(7.69%vs 73.08%,P <0.001)。结论:腹腔镜脾切除术和port门切开术是可行,有效,安全的手术方法,其优点是与最小手术方法相比,LSD术后的总并发症发生率低于OSD术后(19.23%vs 42.31%,P <0.05)。侵入性手术治疗门静脉高压症和脾功能亢进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号