首页> 外文期刊>Visual Neuroscience: An International Journal for Empirical and Theoretical Research >Modeling receptive-field structure of koniocellular, magnocellular, and parvocellular LGN cells in the owl monkey (Aotus trivigatus).
【24h】

Modeling receptive-field structure of koniocellular, magnocellular, and parvocellular LGN cells in the owl monkey (Aotus trivigatus).

机译:建模猫头鹰猴(Aotus trivigatus)中的小细胞,小细胞和小细胞LGN细胞的受体场结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most cells in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of primates have a concentric center/surround receptive-field organization. Details of the relationship between center and surround often can be used to predict how cells respond to visual stimuli. Models of the receptive-field organization and center/surround relationships also are useful when comparing cell classes. In the present study, we used the difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) model to quantitatively examine and compare the receptive-field center/surround organization of koniocellular (K), magnocellular (M), and parvocellular (P) LGN cells of owl monkeys. We obtained estimates of receptive-field center size (r(c)) and center sensitivity (K(c)), and surround size (r(s)), and surround sensitivity (K(s)) from 62 K, M, and P LGN cells by fitting their spatial-frequency responses with a DOG function (Rodieck, 1965; Croner & Kaplan, 1995). The DOG function not only accounted for the responses of P and M cells, but also provided a good description of K-cell responses. We found that at matched eccentricities of less than 15 deg, K cells had the largest r(c) and r(s) among the three cell classes. K cells also had the lowest K(c) and K(s). Center and surround sizes tended to increase with retinal eccentricity for all three cell classes, but K cells showed a more variable pattern. There was an inverse relationship between sensitivity and size for both the receptive-field center and surround in all three cell classes. The surround/center volume ratio remained similar across cell classes. We conclude that K, M, and P LGN cell classes differ in the details of their receptive-field structure, but share common principles of center/surround organization.
机译:灵长类动物的视网膜和外侧膝状核(LGN)中的大多数细胞具有同心的中心/周围感受野组织。中心与周围之间关系的详细信息通常可以用来预测细胞对视觉刺激的反应。比较细胞类别时,感受野组织和中心/周围关系的模型也很有用。在本研究中,我们使用高斯差异(DOG)模型来定量检查和比较猫头鹰的巨细胞(K),大细胞(M)和小细胞(P)LGN细胞的感受野中心/周围组织猴子。我们从62 K,M获得估计的接收场中心大小(r(c))和中心灵敏度(K(c)),周围大小(r(s))和周围灵敏度(K(s)),和P LGN细胞通过使它们的空间频率响应与DOG函数相适应(Rodieck,1965; Croner&Kaplan,1995)。 DOG功能不仅考虑了P细胞和M细胞的反应,而且还很好地描述了K细胞反应。我们发现,在小于15度的匹配偏心率下,K细胞在三个细胞类别中具有最大的r(c)和r(s)。 K细胞的K(c)和K(s)也最低。对于所有三个细胞类别,中心和周围的大小都随着视网膜偏心率的增加而增加,但K细胞显示出更多的可变模式。在所有三种细胞类别中,感受野的中心和周围的灵敏度和大小之间存在反比关系。跨细胞类别的环绕/中心体积比仍然相似。我们得出的结论是,K,M和P LGN细胞类别在其接收域结构的细节上有所不同,但具有中心/周围组织的共同原理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号