首页> 外文期刊>Tumori. >Duration time of vacuum-assisted biopsy for nonpalpable breast masses: comparison between stereotactic and ultrasound-guided procedure.
【24h】

Duration time of vacuum-assisted biopsy for nonpalpable breast masses: comparison between stereotactic and ultrasound-guided procedure.

机译:不可触及的乳腺肿块的真空辅助活检的持续时间:立体定向和超声引导程序之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims and background. Minimally invasive biopsy should be a standard practice in the non-operative diagnosis of breast lesions that are suspicious for or highly suggestive of malignancy. The aim of this study was to compare the procedure duration time for different methods of minimally invasive image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Methods. Six hundred and ninety-one women with nonpalpable breast masses classified as BI-RADS IV or V were studied. All of them underwent minimally invasive percutaneous VABB with an 11-gauge needle. In 402 patients an ultrasound-guided procedure with a hand-held device was performed while in 289 women stereotactic biopsy was carried out using a dedicated prone table unit with digital imaging. In each case the duration of biopsy was measured in terms of the total procedure time, room time and physician time. Results. There were no significant differences between the stereotactic and ultrasound-guided groups with regard to patient age, body mass index, menopausal status, history of parity, hormone replacement therapy, breast parenchymal pattern (according to Wolfe's classification), family history of breast cancer, mass size and number of samples. Ultrasound-guided biopsy was found to take significantly less time than prone stereotactic biopsy in every aspect of procedure duration. Mean total procedure time, room time, and physician time in minutes were 26.7 +/- 8.2 vs 47.5 +/- 9.4 (P <0.01), 23.1 +/- 8.5 vs 36.5 +/- 9.2 (P <0.05), and 12.3 +/- 5.6 vs 18.6 +/- 5.9 (P <0.05), respectively. Conclusions. Ultrasound-guided breast biopsy is less time-consuming than the stereotactic procedure for both the patient and the physician. Because of the shorter procedure time (as well as other well-known advantages: real-time imaging, lower cost), ultrasound-guided biopsy should be considered the method of choice for sampling suspicious nonpalpable breast masses.
机译:目的和背景。微创活检应作为非手术诊断可疑或高度提示恶性乳房病变的标准做法。这项研究的目的是比较不同方法的微创图像引导真空辅助乳腺活检(VABB)的不同程序的持续时间。方法。研究了961名具有无法触及的乳腺肿块分类为BI-RADS IV或V的妇女。他们都用11号针头进行了微创经皮VABB。在402位患者中,使用手持设备进行了超声引导操作,而在289位女性中,使用带有数字成像功能的俯卧台进行了立体定向活检。在每种情况下,活检的持续时间均以总手术时间,室温和医生时间来衡量。结果。在患者的年龄,体重指数,绝经状态,均等史,激素替代疗法,乳腺癌实质模式(根据沃尔夫分类),乳腺癌家族史,质量大小和样品数量。在程序持续时间的各个方面,发现超声引导的活检所花费的时间明显少于俯卧位的立体活检。平均总手术时间,房间时间和以分钟为单位的医生时间分别为26.7 +/- 8.2与47.5 +/- 9.4(P <0.01),23.1 +/- 8.5与36.5 +/- 9.2(P <0.05)和12.3 +/- 5.6与18.6 +/- 5.9(P <0.05)。结论。对于患者和医师而言,超声引导下的乳腺活检比立体定向手术耗时少。由于手术时间较短(以及其他众所周知的优点:实时成像,成本较低),超声引导下的活检应被视为对可疑的不可触及的乳腺肿块进行采样的选择方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号