Biofuel lubricity measurements A comparison of the HFRR and the SLBOCLE test methods

A. Weinebeck; H. Murrenhoff

首页> 外文期刊>Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik >Biofuel lubricity measurements A comparison of the HFRR and the SLBOCLE test methods

【24h】

Biofuel lubricity measurements A comparison of the HFRR and the SLBOCLE test methods

机译：生物燃料润滑性测量HFRR和SLBOCLE测试方法的比较

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In this paper recent results from comparative lubricity measurements with the HFRR, the SLBOCLE and the BOCLE are presented and discussed. Special interest lies on suitability of these test rigs to Green biofuel candidates. This research is part of the Tailor Made Fuels from Biomass Cluster of excellence at RWTH Aachen University.

机译：本文介绍并讨论了使用HFRR，SLBOCLE和BOCLE进行的比较润滑性测量的最新结果。这些试验设备对绿色生物燃料候选产品的适用性特别感兴趣。这项研究是亚琛工业大学（RWTH Aachen University）卓越生物质集群的量身定制燃料的一部分。

著录项

来源
《Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik》 |2014年第6期|共7页
作者
A. Weinebeck; H. Murrenhoff;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类机械摩擦、磨损与润滑;
关键词
Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass; Lubricity; HFRR; SLBOCLE; BOCLE;

机译：生物质量身定制的燃料;润滑性;HFRR;SLBOCLE;BOCLE;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Biofuel lubricity measurements A comparison of the HFRR and the SLBOCLE test methods [J] . A. Weinebeck, H. Murrenhoff Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik . 2014,第6期

机译：生物燃料润滑性测量HFRR和SLBOCLE测试方法的比较
2. How well documented are testing strategies and outcome measurement methods in trials of tests? A comparison of reporting quality in test-treatment and monitoring RCTS [J] . Jac Dinnes, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Alice Sitch, Trials . 2013,第SUPPLEMENTa1期

机译：在测试试验中，测试策略和结果测量方法的文献化程度如何？ RCTS测试处理和监控报告质量的比较
3. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts. [J] . Augustin J C, Carlier V Food microbiology . 2006,第1期

机译：通过实验室间比较来组织食品微生物学能力测试计划的经验教训：使用中的分析方法，方法对细菌计数的影响以及细菌计数的测量不确定性。
4. Diesel Fuel Lubricity Comparisons with HFRR and Scuffing Load Ball-on-Cylinder Lubricity Evaluator Methods, part II [C] . Markku Aaro Kuronen, Ulla Kiiski, Kalle Lehto International Conference on Engines Vehicles . 2015

机译：柴油燃料润滑性与HFRR和磨损载荷球上圆柱润滑剂评估器方法，第二部分
5. Mathematics curriculum based measurement to predict state test performance: A comparison of measures and methods. [D] . Stevens Olinger, Erika Leigh. 2012

机译：基于数学课程的度量以预测状态测试的性能：度量和方法的比较。
6. How well documented are testing strategies and outcome measurement methods in trials of tests? A comparison of reporting quality in test-treatment and monitoring RCTS [O] . Jac Dinnes, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Alice Sitch, 2013

机译：在测试试验中测试策略和结果测量方法的文献化程度如何？ RCTS测试处理和监控报告质量的比较
7. A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I [O] . Passing, H., Bablok, W. 1983

机译：两种不同分析方法测量测量平等的新生物测量方法。线性回归程序在临床化学方法比较研究中的应用，第一部分

Biofuel lubricity measurements A comparison of the HFRR and the SLBOCLE test methods

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅