...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicologic pathology >Regulatory forum opinion piece*: Supporting the need for international harmonization of safety assessments for food flavoring substances
【24h】

Regulatory forum opinion piece*: Supporting the need for international harmonization of safety assessments for food flavoring substances

机译:监管论坛意见*:支持对食品调味剂安全性评估进行国际统一的需要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The advancement of technology and the growth of international commerce underscore the need for global harmonization of regulatory safety requirements and their assessment pertaining to consumer products such as drugs, medical devices, and food. This need is particularly relevant when safety requirements involve time-intensive and costly animal safety studies. Here we present the current regulatory requirements in Europe, the United States, and Japan for flavoring substances (FSs) used in foods and point out significant differences relevant to the international standardization for safety assessments that in our opinion need to be addressed and overcome. The safety assessments that are carried out for FSs in various countries are influenced by divergent definitions of FS, by the information required and available for regulatory submission, and by different regulatory procedures, including the use of decision tree approaches. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the Expert Panel of the U.S. Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), and the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) are making efforts to improve and harmonize the safety assessment of FSs. The application of in silico methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationships and read-across strategies relying on expert input are useful as a first-step screening of the assessment. Application of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach permits conclusions that are compatible with the risk assessment approaches currently used by international advisory committees.The Japanese Regulatory Authority, on the other hand, does not yet consider in silico methods but still requires in vivo and in vitro genotoxicity test data as well as repeat-dose 90-day toxicity data in at least one species, to be submitted as the first step in the safety assessment of FSs. With this article, we echo requests that have been made for xenobiotics by the pharmaceutical industry worldwide, extending them to food-related products, especially FSs. We encourage regulatory agencies to adopt globally harmonized safety assessment procedures, regulatory guidelines, and review practices for FSs to foster global trade and to reduce costs and laboratory animal use.
机译:技术的进步和国际贸易的增长突显了全球统一监管安全要求及其对消费产品(如药品,医疗器械和食品)的评估的需求。当安全要求涉及耗时且成本高昂的动物安全研究时,这一需求尤其重要。在这里,我们介绍了欧洲,美国和日本目前对食品中使用的调味物质(FSs)的法规要求,并指出了与国际安全评估标准有关的重大差异,我们认为这些差异必须加以解决和克服。各国对FS进行的安全性评估受FS定义不同,监管提交所需和可获得的信息以及包括使用决策树方法在内的不同监管程序的影响。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA),美国调味料和提取物制造商协会(FEMA)专家小组以及食品和农业组织(FAO)/世界卫生组织(WHO)食品添加剂专家委员会(JECFA)是努力改善和统一FS的安全评估。计算机方法的应用,例如定量结构-活性关系和依赖专家输入的交叉策略,可作为评估的第一步筛选。应用毒理学阈值(TTC)方法得出的结论与国际咨询委员会当前使用的风险评估方法相吻合;另一方面,日本监管局尚未考虑计算机方法,但仍需要体内方法以及在至少一个物种中的体外遗传毒性测试数据以及重复剂量90天毒性数据,将作为FS安全性评估的第一步。在本文中,我们回应了全球制药行业对异生物素的要求,将其扩展到食品相关产品,尤其是FS。我们鼓励监管机构采用全球统一的安全评估程序,监管准则,并审查FS的做法,以促进全球贸易并降低成本和实验室动物的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号