首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >Type and intensity of FVIII exposure on inhibitor development in PUPs with haemophilia A A patient-level meta-analysis
【24h】

Type and intensity of FVIII exposure on inhibitor development in PUPs with haemophilia A A patient-level meta-analysis

机译:甲型血友病PUPs抑制剂发展过程中FVIII暴露的类型和强度A患者水平的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The impact of treatment-related factors on inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with haemophilia A is still debated. We present the results of a collaborative, individual patient data meta-analytic project. Eligible data sources were published cohorts of PUPs for which patient-level data were available. The exposures of interest were factor (F)VIII type (recombinant [rFVIII] vs plasma-derived [pdFVIII]) and treatment intensity (>= vs <150 IU/kg/week) at first treatment. Family history of inhibitors, F8 mutations, age, treatment regimen (on-demand vs prophylaxis), secular trend and surgery were analysed as putative confounders using different statistical approaches (multivariable Cox regression, propensity score analyses, CART). Analyses accounted for the multi-centre origin of the data. We included 761 consecutive, unselected PUPs with moderate to severe haemophilia A from 10 centres in Egypt, Germany, Israel and Italy. A total of 27% of patients developed inhibitors; 40% and 22% of patients treated with rFVIII and pdFVIII (unadjusted HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-2.9), respectively; 51 % and 24% of patients receiving high- and low-intensity treatment (unadjusted HR 2.9,95% CI 2.0-4.2), respectively. In adjusted analyses, only treatment intensity remained an independent predictor; the effect of FVIII type was largely due to confounding, but with a significant interaction between FVIII type and treatment intensity. This patient-level meta-analysis confirms, across different statistical approaches, that high-intensity treatment is a strong risk factor for inhibitor development. The possible role of FVIII type in subgroups was suggested by the test for interactions but could not be proven because of the limited subgroups sample sizes.
机译:关于治疗相关因素对以前未经治疗的A型血友病患者(PUP)抑制剂发展的影响仍存在争议。我们提出了一个合作的,个体患者数据荟萃分析项目的结果。符合条件的数据来源已发布,且可获得患者水平的PUP队列。感兴趣的暴露是首次治疗时的因子(F)VIII类型(重组[rFVIII]与血浆来源的[pdFVIII])和治疗强度(> = vs <150 IU / kg /周)。使用不同的统计方法(多变量Cox回归,倾向评分分析,CART),分析抑制剂的家族史,F8突变,年龄,治疗方案(按需vs预防),长期趋势和手术作为推论混杂因素。分析考虑了数据的多中心来源。我们纳入了来自埃及,德国,以色列和意大利的10个中心的761个连续的,未选择的具有中度至重度A型血友病的PUP。共有27%的患者开发了抑制剂;使用rFVIII和pdFVIII治疗的患者分别为40%和22%(未经调整的HR 2.2、95%CI 1.6-2.9);分别接受高强度和低强度治疗的患者分别为51%和24%(未调整的HR 2.9,95%CI 2.0-4.2)。在调整后的分析中,只有治疗强度仍然是独立的预测因子; FVIII类型的影响主要是由于混淆,但FVIII类型与治疗强度之间存在显着的相互作用。这项针对患者的荟萃分析证实,通过不同的统计方法,高强度治疗是抑制剂形成的强大风险因素。相互作用测试表明了FVIII类型在亚组中的可能作用,但由于亚组样本量有限而无法得到证实。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号