首页> 外文期刊>Theory in biosciences >The roots of evo-devo in Russia: Is there a characteristic 'Russian tradition'?
【24h】

The roots of evo-devo in Russia: Is there a characteristic 'Russian tradition'?

机译:俄罗斯evo-devo的根源:是否有独特的“俄罗斯传统”?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper raises the general question of whether there are any national peculiarities that characterize the scientific and philosophical roots of Russian-language evolutionary developmental biology. The researchers and theories are surveyed which, with hindsight, have been crucial for the Russian tradition when it comes to general methodological principles and constituting concepts. Based on published works and archival documents the main concepts of the "founding fathers" of the Russian tradition with their "Western analogues" are compared. The focus is on A. O. Kowalevsky (1840-1901), I. I. Metschnikov (1945-1916), A. N. Sewertzoff (1866-1936), I. I. Schmalhausen (1884-1963) and the parallelisms between them and E. Haeckel (1834-1919), V. Franz (1883-1950), and C. H. Waddington (1905-1977). In addition, the problem of specific influences constituting the Russian-language context of the Modern Synthesis is addressed. The major thesis of this paper is that the very character of the Russian developmental biology and its intellectual environment predisposed a strong bias towards environmentalist interpretations and thus anticipated what we now call "ecological developmental biology".
机译:本文提出了一个普遍的问题,即是否存在任何民族特征,这些特征是俄语语言进化发展生物学的科学和哲学根源。对研究人员和理论进行了调查,事后看来,它们对于通用方法论原则和构成概念对于俄罗斯传统至关重要。根据已发表的作品和档案文件,比较了俄罗斯传统的“开国元勋”的主要概念及其“西方类似物”。重点是AO Kowalevsky(1840-1901),II Metschnikov(1945-1916),AN Sewertzoff(1866-1936),II Schmalhausen(1884-1963)以及它们与E.Haeckel(1834-1919)之间的平行性, V.弗朗兹(1883-1950)和CH Waddington(1905-1977)。此外,还解决了构成现代综合的俄文语境的特定影响问题。本文的主要论点是,俄罗斯发展生物学及其知识环境的特征预示着对环保主义解释的强烈偏见,因此预见了我们现在所说的“生态发展生物学”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号