首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Dietary cis-monounsaturated fatty acids and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes
【24h】

Dietary cis-monounsaturated fatty acids and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes

机译:饮食中的顺式单不饱和脂肪酸与2型糖尿病的代谢控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Whether low-fat, high-carbohydrate (CHO) diets or moderately high-fat, high-monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) diets are preferable for the treatment and prevention of diabetes has been a matter of debate. High-fat diets based on MUFA-rich oils or whole foods have been compared with high-CHO diets for effects on several cardiovascular risk outcomes in diabetic subjects. Early studies using metabolic diets with wide differences in total fat content (15-25% of energy) generally found a beneficial effect of MUFA diets on glycemic control and serum lipids. Recent studies using prescribed diets with a difference of less than or equal to 15% of energy in total fat between low-fat and high-MUFA diets show similar effects on glycemic profiles but still favor MUFA diets for effects on triacylglycerols and HDL cholesterol. It is unclear whether postprandial fat clearance is impaired by CHO diets and improved by MUFA diets, independent of effects on fasting triacylglycerol concentrations. Unless one diet contains abundant antioxidants, the 2 dietary approaches appear to have similar effects on LDL oxidation. Low-fat diets, however, are associated with atherogenic, dense LDL particles, while normal, buoyant LDL predominate with high-fat diets irrespective of fatty acid composition. Limited experimental evidence suggests that MUFA diets favorably influence blood pressure, coagulation, endothelial activation, inflammation, and thermogenic capacity. Energy-controlled high-MUFA diets do not promote weight gain and are more acceptable than low-fat diets for weight loss in obese subjects. Thus, there is good scientific support for MUFA diets as an alternative to low-fat diets for medical nutrition therapy in diabetes.
机译:低脂,高碳水化合物(CHO)饮食还是中等高脂,高单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)饮食在治疗和预防糖尿病方面更可取是一个争论的问题。已经将以富含MUFA的油或全脂食品为基础的高脂饮食与高CHO饮食相比,对糖尿病受试者的几种心血管风险结果具有影响。早期研究使用总脂肪含量差异很大(能量的15-25%)的代谢饮食,通常发现MUFA饮食对血糖控制和血脂有有益作用。最近的研究表明,低脂和高MUFA饮食之间的总脂肪能量差异小于或等于15%的处方饮食对血糖分布具有相似的影响,但对于三酰甘油和HDL胆固醇的影响,MUFA饮食仍受青睐。目前尚不清楚CHO饮食是否会损害餐后脂肪清除,而MUFA饮食是否会改善餐后脂肪清除,而与空腹三酰甘油浓度的影响无关。除非一种饮食中含有丰富的抗氧化剂,否则两种饮食方法似乎对LDL氧化具有相似的作用。然而,低脂饮食与致动脉粥样硬化的致密LDL颗粒有关,而正常,活跃的LDL则主要与高脂饮食有关,而与脂肪酸组成无关。有限的实验证据表明,MUFA饮食对血压,凝血,内皮激活,炎症和生热能力有良好的影响。能量控制的高MUFA饮食不促进体重增加,并且比低脂饮食更适合肥胖受试者的体重减轻。因此,对于糖尿病的医学营养治疗,MUFA饮食作为低脂饮食的替代品具有良好的科学支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号