首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.
【24h】

Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.

机译:腹腔镜与开放式根治性肾切除术治疗大型肾脏肿瘤:长期的前瞻性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopy in the management of large renal tumors (more than 7 cm) is not clearly established. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility, safety and long-term results of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors (T2N0M0) and compared the results with those of open radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2006, 112 patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 renal carcinoma underwent radical nephrectomy at our institution. Clinical data were prospectively collected after categorizing the patients into group 1-41 with laparoscopy and group 2-71 with open surgery. The choice of procedure was nonrandomized and it depended on patient and surgeon preference and experience. RESULTS: The 2 groups were contemporary and comparable in terms of age, body mass index and mean tumor size (9.9 and 10.1 cm, respectively). Concomitant adrenalectomy was performed in 14 patients (34%) in group 1 and in 29 (41%) in group 2. Limited (hilar) lymphadenectomy was performed in 30 patients (73%) in group 1 and in 58 (81%) in group 2. Group 1 patients experienced significantly less blood loss, and had a decreased analgesic requirement, shorter hospital stay and more rapid convalescence, although they required longer operative time (180.8 vs 165.3 minutes, p=0.029). The 2 groups were followed for a similar period (mean 51.4 vs 57.2 months) and there was no difference in 5-year survival data. There were no local or port site recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinical stage T2 renal tumors is effective with the advantages of less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, decreased analgesic requirement and rapid recovery compared with open radical nephrectomy. Long-term results are also similar in the 2 groups of patients. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large tumors is a technically difficult, challenging procedure and it should be attempted by surgeons with significant experience.
机译:目的:腹腔镜在处理较大的肾肿瘤(大于7 cm)中的作用尚不清楚。我们前瞻性评估了腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗大型肾脏肿瘤(T2N0M0)的可行性,安全性和长期结果,并将结果与​​开放性根治性肾切除术进行了比较。材料与方法:在1998年至2006年间,我们机构对112例临床分期为T2N0M0的肾癌患者进行了根治性肾切除术。在将患者分为腹腔镜检查的1-41组和开放手术的治疗的2-71组后,前瞻性收集临床数据。程序的选择是非随机的,并且取决于患者和外科医生的偏好和经验。结果:两组是当代的,在年龄,体重指数和平均肿瘤大小(分别为9.9和10.1 cm)方面具有可比性。第1组14例(34%)和第2组29例(41%)同时进行肾上腺切除术。第1组30例(73%)和58例(81%)淋巴结清扫术第2组。第1组患者虽然需要更长的手术时间(180.8 vs 165.3分钟,p = 0.029),但失血量明显减少,止痛要求降低,住院时间缩短,恢复期更快。两组的随访时间相似(平均51.4 vs 57.2个月),并且5年生存数据没有差异。没有本地或港口站点重复发生。结论:与开放式根治性肾切除术相比,腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗临床T2期肾肿瘤是有效的,具有失血少,住院时间短,止痛需求减少和恢复快的优点。两组患者的长期结果也相似。对于大肿瘤,腹腔镜根治性肾切除术在技术上是困难且具有挑战性的,应由具有丰富经验的外科医生尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号