首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of nursing education >Critical assumptions: thinking critically about critical thinking.
【24h】

Critical assumptions: thinking critically about critical thinking.

机译:批判性假设:批判性思考批判性思维。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The concept of critical thinking has been featured in nursing literature for the past 20 years. It has been described but not defined by both the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the National League for Nursing, although their corresponding accreditation bodies require that critical thinking be included in nursing curricula. In addition, there is no reliable or valid measurement tool for critical thinking ability in nursing. As a result, there is a lack of research support for the assumptions that critical thinking can be learned and that critical thinking ability improves clinical competence. Brookfield suggested that commitments should be made only after a period of critically reflective analysis, during which the congruence between perceptions and reality are examined. In an evidence-based practice profession, we, as nurse educators, need to ask ourselves how we can defend our assumptions that critical thinking can be learned and that critical thinking improves the quality of nursing practice, especially when there is virtually no consensus on a definition.
机译:在过去的20年中,批判性思维的概念已在护理文献中得到了体现。尽管美国护理学院协会和美国国家护理联盟都对它进行了描述,但并未对其进行定义,尽管它们的相应认证机构要求将批判性思维纳入护理课程中。此外,还没有可靠或有效的衡量工具来评估护理中的批判性思维能力。结果,缺乏关于可以学习批判性思维和批判性思维能力提高临床能力的假设的研究支持。布鲁克菲尔德(Brookfield)建议,只有经过一段时间的批判性反思分析之后,才能做出承诺,在此期间,应检查感知与现实之间的一致性。在循证实践行业中,作为护士教育者,我们需要问自己:我们如何捍卫我们的假设,即可以学习批判性思维,而批判性思维可以提高护理实践的质量,尤其是在对护理实践几乎没有共识的情况下。定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号